Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

DAVID CHARLES MIZEN

JurisdictionAustralia — Western Australia
BodyLegal Practice Board of Western Australia (LPBWA)
Professionlawyer — Shop 5 6 Canning Road KALAMUNDA WA 6076
Case numberLegal Practitioners Complaints Committee v Mizen [2021] WASAT 80
Date2 June 2021
HearingState Administrative Tribunal
OutcomeProfessional Misconduct. Referral to Supreme Court (full bench) recommending name be removed from the roll of practitioners

Allegation / charges

Professional Misconduct. Referral to Supreme Court (full bench) recommending name be removed from the roll of practitioners

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundNo

David Charles Mizen, a Western Australian legal practitioner, was convicted in the District Court in December 2020 of one count of distributing and two counts of possessing child exploitation material, receiving a total effective sentence of 3 years' immediate imprisonment. The State Administrative Tribunal found this criminal conduct constituted professional misconduct, demonstrating he was not a fit and proper person to engage in legal practice. The Tribunal characterised his conduct as showing a complete lack of integrity (no express dishonesty finding was made). It resolved to transmit a report to the Supreme Court (full bench) recommending removal of his name from the roll of practitioners. The Committee withdrew its application for costs, and no fine was imposed.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Extremely serious criminal conduct involving highly depraved category 5 child exploitation material depicting real children in acts of sadism, bestiality and bondage
  • Very large collection of material (17,554 images and 1,391 videos across 27 devices)
  • Conduct engaged in over an extended period of at least 10 years
  • No significant indication of remorse
  • Practitioner had a sexual interest in children; conduct fuelled demand for such material
  • Total effective sentence of 3 years' immediate imprisonment

Mitigating factors:

  • Pleaded guilty to the offences
  • Did not oppose the disciplinary application

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://www.lpbwa.org.au/getmedia/e88f5464-6f25-45e2-b150-f9c594dd81c1/register_of_disciplinary_action.pdf