Decision record
Emma Smith
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Barrister Emma Smith admitted three charges of professional misconduct arising from a Family Court hearing on 19 June 2024, where she deliberately allowed the court and the unrepresented father to be misled about the fact that her client had already moved a child to a new nursery in breach of a Specific Issue Order. The tribunal found admitted dishonesty. She self-reported and did not seek any lesser sanction than disbarment. With no exceptional circumstances, the tribunal ordered disbarment plus £3,210 costs payable to the BSB.
Duties found breached:
- Overriding duty to the court
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- No conflict between current clients
Aggravating factors:
- Deliberately allowed the court to be misled on a matter in dispute
- Opposing party (father) was unrepresented
- Dishonesty in the face of the court
Mitigating factors:
- Self-reported to the BSB two hours after the hearing
- Admitted all charges and never sought to evade responsibility
- Frankness before the tribunal
- Conduct out of character for an otherwise exemplary practitioner
- Powerful reference from former head of chambers
- No serious long-term consequences (move later allowed)
Panel
His Honour Nicholas Ainley (Chair); Ms Elahe Youshani; Mr Ian Arundale; Ms Charlotte Davies; Mr Stephen Dann
Duties engaged
- Overriding duty to the court
- Not mislead the court
- Comply with and respect court orders
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Professional independence
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- No conflict between current clients
- Serve justice and improve the law
Documents
Source: https://www.tbtas.org.uk/hearings/findings-and-sentences-of-past-hearings/