Decision record
Timothy Thomas Rogers
Allegation / charges
Breaches
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Respondent, a solicitor, admitted misleading clients into believing proceedings had been issued and claims settled, and making payments to clients from his own funds purportedly in settlement, as well as allowing claims to become statute barred. He paid £28,950 to six clients over 2008-2013. He admitted the factual allegations but denied dishonesty. Applying the Twinsectra test, the Tribunal found his conduct dishonest by ordinary standards and that he must have realised it was dishonest, rejecting his claim that he set his own standard of honesty. Finding no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal struck him off the Roll and ordered costs of £4,019, not to be enforced without leave save for a possible charging order over his properties.
Duties found breached:
- Not mislead the court
- No prejudicial publicity for pending cases
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonest conduct took place over a long period of time
- Conduct was deliberate, calculated and repeated
- Respondent ought reasonably to have known conduct materially breached obligations to protect the public and the reputation of the profession
- Fabricated settlement offers and concealed the true position from clients
Mitigating factors:
- Previous good record over a long period
- Genuine remorse and insight
- Did not profit from his actions
- Candid and open about his errors
- Difficult personal circumstances and accumulating stress at the time
- Long past contribution to the profession
Duties engaged
- Not mislead the court
- No prejudicial publicity for pending cases
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Hold a current practising certificate
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.