Decision record
Trevor Ruddock
Allegation / charges
Struck off, Repayment & Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered February 13, 2010. View PDF JUDGEMENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE COMPLAINT NO. 74 OF 2003 BETWEEN JOAN BURKETT POWELL COMPLAINANT AND TREVOR RUDDOCK RESPONDENT PANEL: PAMELA E BENKA-COKER …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Attorney Trevor Ruddock was retained to handle the sale of inherited property at 117 Great Georges Street. He received a $10,000,000 deposit but failed to account for the funds, failed to stamp the agreement, failed to keep the client informed and failed to complete the transaction. The panel found beyond reasonable doubt that he dishonestly misappropriated $6,880,159.00 and converted it to his own use. He was found guilty of professional misconduct (breaches of Canons IV(r), VII(b)(ii) and I(b)) and struck off the Roll, ordered to make restitution with 12% interest, pay interest on the $2.5m already returned, and pay $100,000 costs.
Duties found breached:
- No improper communication with the court
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonest misappropriation of client funds of $6,880,159.00 converted to own use
- Position of trust/fiduciary relationship breached
- Failure to account or produce evidence funds held on trust
- Prolonged delay (agreement 2002, unresolved by 2008)
Mitigating factors:
- Paid over $2,500,000 to complainant's new attorneys before conclusion of proceedings
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_costs_amount=100000"]
Duties engaged
- No improper communication with the court
- Honesty
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Disclose material information to client
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Diligence and timeliness
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/trevor-ruddock-complaint-no-74-of-2003/