Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Mahmood Ali & Montague Mason Solicitors Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10330/2009
Date01/01/2009
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Suspension24 months
CostsGBP 15,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Three respondents faced allegations arising from a mortgage/conveyancing fraud involving client account shortages exceeding £5 million. The Tribunal found all allegations proved. The First Respondent (a registered foreign lawyer) was found to have acted dishonestly, having deliberately misled mortgage lenders and misappropriated funds; he was struck off the Register of Foreign Lawyers and ordered to pay £15,000 costs. The Second Respondent, a solicitor and supervising solicitor, was found not dishonest but to have abdicated his supervisory duties; he was suspended for two years with no costs order. The Third Respondent (recognised body) had been dissolved, so no further order was made. An out-of-time appeal by the Second Respondent was dismissed with costs in 2014.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Large-scale mortgage fraud with client shortages exceeding £5 million across the firms
  • Deliberate misleading of institutional mortgage lenders
  • Destruction/shredding of accounting records and files
  • First Respondent fled to Pakistan and gave no response to investigation
  • Serious damage to reputation of the profession and threat to the public

Mitigating factors:

  • Second Respondent admitted the allegations and cooperated fully with investigators and police
  • Second Respondent had a previously unblemished record
  • Second Respondent was found not to have been dishonest and was himself a victim of the First Respondent's fraud
  • Second Respondent's difficult personal and financial circumstances (redundancy, young family, impecuniosity)
  • Second Respondent was away on holiday when the fraudulent payments were made

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10330/