Tohme, Andrew Joseph
Allegation / charges
(a) The Solicitor failed to obey the Legal Profession Uniform Law; (b) The Solicitor’s conduct was dishonourable and contrary to the duty of legal practitioners to be honest and to have the utmost good faith in all dealings in the course of legal practice; (c) the Solicitor’s conduct is contrary to the Solicitor’s duty not to engage in conduct which is likely to a material degree to be prejudicial to, or diminish the public confidence in the administration of justice, or bring the profession into disrepute; and (d) The Solicitor’s dishonest conduct is antithetical to the position of trust and confidence that legal practitioners are placed in. — Unable to fulfil the inherent requirements of an Australian legal practitioner
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The tribunal found the Solicitor engaged in dishonest and dishonourable conduct, failed to obey the Legal Profession Uniform Law, and acted in a manner prejudicial to public confidence in the administration of justice, rendering the Solicitor unable to fulfil the inherent requirements of an Australian legal practitioner. An express finding of dishonesty was made. No specific sanction is set out in the excerpt provided.
Duties found breached:
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
No documents recorded.
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=6a311b5b-5422-47bc-8d6e-630576a14cfb