Malik, Mohammad Ajmal
Allegation / charges
Acting without authority and/ or proper instructions - Filed a Review Application with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal without having been retained by the purported Review Applicant. Acting without authority and/ or proper instructions - Communicated with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal purportedly acting for the Review Applicant without having been retained. Breach of Duty to the Court and the administration of justice - Failed to respond to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a period of 10 months. — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The practitioner was found to have engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct for acting without authority or proper instructions by filing a review application and communicating with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal without being retained, and for failing to respond to the Tribunal for 10 months. No express finding of dishonesty was made and no sanction details are provided in the text.
Duties found breached:
- Overriding duty to the court
- No improper communication with the court
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Documents
No documents recorded.
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=995313c4-a52a-482e-ab17-4a7ad18c1698