§ discipline
‹ Back

David Baynon Crosby

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12658/2024
Date14/03/2025
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundYes

David Banyon Crosby, a partner, COLP and COFA at Crosby & Woods, faced three allegations brought by the SRA. The Tribunal found all allegations proved, including dishonesty. Allegation 1.1: between 8 July and 15 September 2021 he attempted to mislead the SRA investigation into Client A's Personal Injury Trust by falsely claiming he was not the fee earner, providing five letters to Client A that were not genuine, and providing a non-genuine file review memo purportedly written by Mr Scott. Allegation 1.2: between 3 May 2018 and 3 May 2020 he caused or allowed the Firm to withdraw client account monies for costs without prior written notification, causing a shortage of £39,660. Allegation 1.3: in February 2021 he provided misleading information on the Firm's PII proposal form regarding Mr Rippon's status. The Tribunal applied the Ivey test and found dishonesty. It did not find a breach of paragraphs 3.2 and 3.3 of the Code for Firms as not particularised. The hearing proceeded in Mr Crosby's absence. The Tribunal determined strike-off was the only appropriate and proportionate sanction absent exceptional circumstances.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Conduct was dishonest
  • Fabrication of documents provided to the regulator
  • Attempt to mislead the regulatory body to protect his own position
  • Abuse of position of trust as solicitor, owner, COLP and COFA
  • Transferred and closed Client A's trust account without consent of client or co-trustee

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12658/