Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026

The duty in context

No improper benefit, loan or bequest client

The lawyer must not procure a gift, bequest, loan or other benefit from a client beyond fair remuneration, and must ensure the client is independently advised where such a benefit is conferred.

160 cases 59% strike-off avg suspension 8.5 mo avg fine 6,251 16 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 1.2 partial 95 cases
1.2 You do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook gC18; gC19 partial 1 case
gC18 The following may reasonably be seen as compromising your independence in breach of Rule 8 ... .2 lending money to any such client ...; or .3 accepting any money (whether as a loan or otherwise) from any client, professional client or other intermediary, unless it is a payment for your professional services or reimbursement of expenses or of disbursements made on behalf of the client; gC19 If you are offered a gift ... you should consider carefully whether the circumstances and size of the gift would reasonably lead others to think that your independence had been compromised.
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.7.9 partial
An attorney-at-law shall ensure that any gratuitous benefit received from a client, whether monetary or non-monetary, is compliant with applicable legislation on bribery and corruption, and any other regulation applicable to attorneys-at-law and recognised law entities in respect of gifts.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 12.2; 12.3 strong 32 cases
12.2 A solicitor must not do anything: (a) calculated to dispose a client or a third party to confer on the solicitor... any benefit in excess of the solicitor's fair and reasonable remuneration... 12.3 A solicitor must not borrow any money, nor assist an associate to borrow money, from: 12.3.1 a client of the solicitor or of the solicitor's law practice...
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr46-47 strong 5 cases
A barrister must not in any dealings with a client exercise any undue influence intended to dispose the client to benefit the barrister in excess of the barrister's fair remuneration ... A barrister must not receive any money or property by way of loan from any client, the relative of a client or a business entity ... during the course of a retainer with that client unless the ordinary business ... includes lending money.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch3 — Bequests or gifts by client to solicitor, staff or family; Borrowing money from a client strong 11 cases
Where a client intends to bequeath under their will or make a gift by deed to the solicitor drafting the will or deed, or to a partner, staff member, or member of the family of that solicitor, then the solicitor should not act and should advise the testator to consult another firm... A solicitor should not borrow money from a client unless that client is independently represented by another firm in that transaction or it is part of the business of the client to lend money.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct no clear equivalent
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.6.9 strong
A member must not enter into a contract with a client, or prepare a document... by which the client confers a gratuitous benefit, whether monetary or non-monetary, on that member, a close relative or a partner or employee of that member's firm or the member's employer unless: a) the benefit or the value of the benefit so conferred is no more than the lesser of £500 or (where applicable) one half of one per cent of the client's current estimated net estate.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 3.4-39; r 3.4-28.1 strong
3.4-39 Unless the client is a family member of the lawyer or the lawyer's partner or associate, a lawyer must not prepare or cause to be prepared an instrument giving the lawyer or an associate a gift or benefit from the client, including a testamentary gift. [3.4-28.1 Except for borrowing from a regulated lender or from a related person, a lawyer shall not borrow from a client.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 3.4-38 strong 8 cases
Unless the client is a family member of the lawyer or the lawyer's partner or associate, a lawyer must not prepare or cause to be prepared an instrument giving the lawyer or an associate a gift or benefit from the client, including a testamentary gift.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 5.8 / r 5.10 strong
A lawyer must not accept a gift from a client if there is a possibility of the gift being or appearing to be inconsistent with the trust and confidence reposed by the client. ... A lawyer must not draft or assist in drafting a provision of a will or other instrument under which the lawyer may take a benefit ... unless, before the execution of the will or instrument, the person concerned has taken independent advice.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.8 partial 3 cases
Where you are consulted about a matter in which you have, or your practice unit has, a personal or a financial interest, the position must be made clear to the client as soon as possible.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 23 (Prohibited borrowing transactions); r 24 (Purchases from client); r 25 (Gifts from client) strong 3 cases
23 Prohibited borrowing transactions; 24 Purchases from client; 25 Gifts from client
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 7.05 strong
A solicitor must tell a client who offers him a gift that the client is not obliged to give him anything. A solicitor must refuse any gift to him as a solicitor if it is significant in value unless the client is independently advised as to the gift. A solicitor must not do anything which might be construed as inviting a gift from a client.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 9.5 strong
Apart from the payment of fees for professional services or reimbursement of expenses or of disbursements or of agreed interest thereon, a practising barrister must not, whether by himself or through anyone acting for and on his behalf, accept any money, whether by way of gift, loan or otherwise, from a lay client, the relative of a client or a business entity of which a client is a director, partner or manager.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

160 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Adrian Robert Berkeley
    SDT solicitor 12866/2025 2026-07-21 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Shacklady, Robert John
    OLSC solicitor Coopers Advisors 2026-07-09 text match

    The solicitor: Borrowed money from a client; and Engaged in unethical conduct by entering into a personal financial transaction with the client — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct

    Fine Reprimand Satisfactory completion of Ethics Course and Practice Management Course $7,000.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Clive Graham Wood
    SDT solicitor 12833/2025 2026-06-15 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Donald Lewis Wilkinson
    LSBC lawyer 2026-03-23 found breached

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF View decision
  • Gordon Wayne Ruley
    LSBC lawyer 2025-10-24 found breached

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF View decision
  • Alison Haley Griffiths
    SDT solicitor 12759/2025 2025-08-29 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Criminal Convictions, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Nigel John Weller
    SDT solicitor 12693/2024 2025-08-22 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Reprimand 1 PDF View decision
  • Oliver James Saxon
    SDT solicitor 12694/2024 2025-07-25 text match

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Failures, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Lewis Brady
    SDT solicitor 12660/2024 2025-06-19 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Fasar Mahmood
    SDT solicitor 12687/2024 2025-06-19 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Respondent AR
    SDT solicitor 12668/2024 2025-06-11 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Belinda Owusuah Sarkodie
    SDT solicitor 12614/2024 2025-05-30 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12672/2024 2025-04-26 rule cited

    Appeals

    S.44E/ S.46/Paragraph 14C Appeals 1 PDF View decision
  • Antony Davies
    SDT solicitor 12652/2024 2025-04-01 found breached

    Breaches, Lack of Integrity

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Lois Yvonne Bayliss
    SDT solicitor 12496/2023 2024-10-21 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Philip Julian Paul Hyland
    SDT solicitor 12539/2024 2024-09-24 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Jasvinder Singh Gill
    SDT solicitor 12519/2023 2024-06-13 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Sunny Sidhu
    SDT solicitor 12523/2023 2024-05-30 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Leo McGarvey
    SSDT solicitor Leo McGarvey, 8 Millhall Court, Plains, Airdrie 2024-05-29 text match
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael Shane Dugas
    LSBC lawyer 2024-05-10 found breached

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF View decision
  • Frederick William Adams
    SDT solicitor 12490/2023 2024-03-15 rule cited

    Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Jack Grunhut
    SDT solicitor 12488/2023 2024-01-26 text match

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher Michael Haddock
    SDT solicitor 12401/2022 2023-08-01 text match

    Breaches, Client Money, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Lyon Thomas Finkelstein
    LSBC lawyer 2023-06-28 found breached

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement

    Rule 3-7.1 Consent Agreement 1 PDF View decision
  • Gordon William Tulloch Murphy
    SSDT solicitor Gordon William Tulloch Murphy, 12 Abercromby Place, Stirling 2023-01-19 text match
    fine No Appeal 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.