The duty in context
No improper communication with the court court
The lawyer must not communicate with the court on a matter of substance in the opponent's absence except where permitted, and must promptly disclose to the opponent any such communication.
How the codes express this duty
E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code no clear equivalent
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook no clear equivalent
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rules 22.5; 22.6 strong 99 cases
22.5 A solicitor must not, outside an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless: ... 22.6 A solicitor must promptly tell the opponent what passes between the solicitor and a court in a communication referred to in Rule 22.5.
Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules · 2015 (June 2026 compilation) · archived copy · official source ↗
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr53-54 strong 36 cases
A barrister must not, outside an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless [permitted]. A barrister must promptly tell an opponent what passes between the barrister and a court in a communication referred to in Rule 53.
Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules · 2015 (as amended 14 May 2025) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch5 — Communication with the court strong 82 cases
A solicitor should not discuss the merits of a case with the judge, registrar, clerk or other official before whom a case is pending. Where during the case a written communication to the court is required, the solicitor should deliver a copy of the communication to the opposing party.
Solicitor's Guide to Professional Conduct (Law Society of Ireland) · 4th ed. (2022) · archived copy · official source ↗
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 5.28; Rule 5.29 strong 82 cases
Barristers shall not approach a Judge to discuss with them any matter then pending or at hearing before that Judge without the consent of the Judge and their opposing lawyer or lay litigant being present during such approach.
Code of Conduct for the Bar of Ireland · 2024 · archived copy · official source ↗
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(i) partial 26 cases
In any proceeding in a Court an Attorney shall not communicate or cause any other person to communicate with a juror as to the merits of such proceedings, and shall only do so with a Judge or person exercising Judicial functions:- (i) in the normal course of the proceedings, or (ii) where authorised by law, or the practice of the Courts or with the consent of the parties.
Legal Profession (Canons of Professional Ethics) Rules · 1978 (principal) · archived copy · official source ↗
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code G.3.4 partial
Members must not discuss the merits of a case with a member of the judiciary before whom a case is pending or by whom it may be heard unless invited to do so in the presence of the lawyer for the other side.
Law Society of Jersey Code of Conduct · 1 January 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 5.1-2(d) partial
When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall not ... endeavour or allow anyone else to endeavour, directly or indirectly, to influence the decision or action of a tribunal or any of its officials in any case or matter by any means other than open persuasion as an advocate
Law Society of Ontario — Rules of Professional Conduct · current · archived copy · official source ↗
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.1-2(d) partial 15 cases
A lawyer should never seek privately to influence a court or tribunal, directly or indirectly, in the lawyer's or a client's favour, nor should the lawyer attempt to curry favour with juries by fawning, flattery or pretended solicitude for their personal comfort.
Code of Professional Conduct for British Columbia (BC Code) · 2017 · archived copy · official source ↗
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 13.2.2 strong
A lawyer must not discuss any case or matter before the court with any judicial officer involved in the proceeding either formally or informally outside of the rules of procedure ... In cases of doubt, the lawyers for other parties (or if a party is not represented, then the party concerned) should be informed of any matters being brought before the court.
Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 · SR 2008/214 · archived copy · official source ↗
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 30 (Communication with court) partial 9 cases
30 Communication with court
Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 · 2015 · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 10.02 Commentary 2-3 strong
Except in the course of an application to the court, a solicitor must not discuss the merits of the case with a judge, magistrate or other adjudicator before whom a case is pending ... unless invited to do so in the presence of the solicitor or barrister for the other side ... a solicitor shall at the same time deliver a copy of it to his professional adversary.
Hong Kong Solicitors' Guide to Professional Conduct (Volume 1) · current · archived copy · official source ↗
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.48 strong
A practising barrister must not, outside of an ex parte application or a hearing of which an opponent has had proper notice, communicate in the opponent's absence with the Court concerning any matter of substance in connection with current proceedings unless ... A practising barrister must promptly inform an opponent of what has passed between the barrister and the Court in a communication referred to in sub-paragraph (a) hereof.
Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong SAR · 2018 · archived copy · official source ↗
Cases dealing with this duty
602 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern
-
-
Thomas G Myles
In the matter of Thomas G Myles, a solicitor formerly practising as Myles & Co, Solicitors, 21 Hillside, Monaghan, Co Monaghan, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [4961/DT110/14 and High Court record 201…
strike_off View decision -
Cindy McCarthy Yates
In the matter of Cindy McCarthy Yates, a solicitor previously practising as McCarthy Solicitors at 4 The Gully, Bandon, Co Cork, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [12313/DT24/14; 12313/DT44/14; 12313/DT…
strike_off View decision -
Greenstein, David
1. Contravened a condition on his practising certificate for the years ending 30 June 2011 and 30 June 2012 2. Failed to comply with his undertaking to the Law Society 3. Failed to respond to correspondence in respect o…
Costs Removal of practitioner's name from the Roll of Local Lawyers $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision -
Alexander Gibbons
In the matter of Alexander Gibbons, a solicitor formerly practising as Gibbons & Co, 2 Riverside, Kent Street, Clonakilty, Co Cork, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [5839/DT119/12; 5839/DT147/12; 5839/…
strike_off View decision -
-
Arlean D. Moreta Beckford
Struck Off, Restitution ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered September 01, 2015. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO: 104/2014 IN THE MATTER OF LORETT…
-
Peter Curtiss BEVAN
Guilty of professional misconduct on 1 charge
-
Peter Kenny
In the matter of Peter Kenny, a solicitor formerly practising as Kenny Associates, College Street, Carlow, Co Carlow, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [8864/DT61/14 and High Court record 2015 no 71 SA]…
strike_off View decision -
Elizabeth M Cazabon
In the matter of Elizabeth M Cazabon, a solicitor of Cazabon Solicitors, Gray Office Park, Galway Retail Park, Headford, Co Galway, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [8142/DT05/14, 8142/DT22/14, 8142/DT…
strike_off View decision -
Paul Lambert
In the matter of Paul Lambert, a solicitor practising as Merrion Legal, Solicitors & Community Trademark Agents, Suite 12, Butlers Court, Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954…
strike_off View decision -
Kevin M O'Gara
In the matter of Kevin M O'Gara, solicitor, formerly practising as Kevin O'Gara, Unit 4, Level 1, the Reeks Gateway, Killarney, Co Kerry, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [8391/DT129/13 and High Court …
strike_off View decision -
O'donnell, Bernard Kevin
1. Improperly charging fees for acting as Attorney & Enduring Guardian 2. Misappropriation 3. Breaching rule 12 of the Solicitors Rules 4. Misleading the Guardianship Tribunal 5. Falsely informing the Law Society and a …
Costs Removal of practitioner's name from the Roll of Local Lawyers $0.00 Proceedings Instituted 1 PDF View decision -
Kevin O'Keeffe
In the matter of Kevin O’Keeffe, solicitor, formerly practising in Coakley Moloney Solicitors, 49 South Mall, Cork, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [4536/DT16/13 and High Court record 2014 no 100 SA] …
conditions View decision -
Niall O'Kelly
In the matter of Niall O’Kelly, a solicitor previously practising as Niall O’Kelly, Solicitors, 52 Fortfield Park, Terenure, Dublin 6W, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [5202/DT145/13 and High Court re…
strike_off View decision -
John A Tobin
In the matter of John A Tobin, solicitor, practising as John A Tobin Solicitors, Level 3 Cornmarket, Robert Street, Limerick, and in the matter of an application by the Law Society of Ireland to the Solicitors Disciplin…
strike_off View decision -
J Finbarr O'Gorman
In the matter of J Finbarr O’Gorman, a solicitor practising as Finbarr O’Gorman Solicitors at Mayfield House, Hollyfort Road, Gorey, Co Wexford, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [7672/DT45/13, 7672/DT4…
strike_off View decision -
Wilson, James Christopher
Improper communication with a Judge (through Her Honour's associate) whilst judgment was reserved — A reasonable likelihood of a finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct
Reprimand $0.00 About About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision -
Oliver Hanrahan
In the matter of Oliver Hanrahan, solicitor, formerly practising as Hanrahan Rynne Solicitors, 3B Riverside Business Park, Ennis, Co Clare, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [9381/DT12/14 and High Court…
strike_off View decision -
Oliver Hanrahan
In the matter of Oliver Hanrahan, solicitor, formerly practising as Hanrahan Rynne Solicitors, 3B Riverside Business Park, Ennis, Co Clare, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [9381/DT132/13 and High Cour…
strike_off View decision -
Greg (otherwise John G) Casey
In the matter of Greg (otherwise John G) Casey, formerly practising in the solicitors’ firm of Casey & Co, North Main Street, Bandon, Co Cork, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [5355/DT06/09 and 2014 no…
strike_off View decision -
John Martin Carr
In the matter of John Martin Carr, solicitor, formerly practising in the firm of Rhatigan & Co, Solicitors, Liosbaun House, Tuam Road, Galway City, Galway, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [4214/DT123/…
strike_off View decision -
David Walsh
In the matter of David Walsh, solicitor, formerly practising as David Walsh & Co, Solicitors, at 12 Mount Street, Mullingar, Co Westmeath, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [4550/DT118/13 and High Court…
no_order View decision -
John Martin Carr
In the matter of John Martin Carr, solicitor, formerly practising in the firm of Rhatigan & Co, Solicitors, Liosbaun House, Tuam Road, Galway City, Galway, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [4214/DT97/1…
strike_off View decision -
John Martin Carr
In the matter of John Martin Carr, solicitor, formerly practising in the firm of Rhatigan & Co, Solicitors, Liosbaun House, Tuam Road, Galway City, Galway, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [4214/DT142/…
strike_off View decision
Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.