§ discipline
‹ Back

John David Mair

JurisdictionScotland
BodyScottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal (SSDT)
Professionsolicitor — ohn David Mair, formerly of NEGO8 Ltd, 5 Whittingehame Drive, Glasgow
Date28th Feb 2025
AppealNo Appeal

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundNo

John David Mair, sole principal of NEGO8 Ltd, was found guilty of professional misconduct, singly and in cumulo, following repeated breaches of the Accounts Rules identified over inspections between 2012 and 2018, including client account deficits, failure to keep proper records, failure to cooperate with inspectors, failure to maintain cashroom manager skills, and submission of a misleading Accounts Certificate. The Fiscal expressly did not aver dishonesty, and the Tribunal declined to infer it, instead finding the conduct demonstrated a lack of integrity (per Wingate). Proceeding largely in the Respondent's absence after a lengthy procedural history, and noting his lack of insight and ongoing suspension, the Tribunal ordered him struck off the Roll of Solicitors and found him liable for expenses. The Tribunal also repelled the Respondent's preliminary pleas of time bar, res judicata and public interest.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Prolonged and repeated breaches of the Accounts Rules over a number of years
  • Failure to rectify breaches identified in successive inspections (2012, 2016, 2017, 2018)
  • Significant risk to clients, the public and the Guarantee Fund
  • Appointment of a Judicial Factor reflecting seriousness
  • Fundamental lack of insight and accountability throughout proceedings
  • Prior 2019 finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct relating to a related sequence of conduct
  • Failure to engage with the Complainers and rectify issues
  • Submission of a false/misleading Accounts Certificate

Mitigating factors:

  • Respondent referenced ill health (physical and mental), though no medical evidence was ever produced
  • Immediate risk to the public was low as the Respondent was already suspended from practice

Documents

Source: https://www.ssdt.org.uk/findings/law-society-v-john-david-mair/