Ramya Nagesh
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Barrister Ms Ramya Nagesh faced 6 charges of professional misconduct arising from her conduct at a remote inquest in Pontypridd on 6 December 2022, including allegations of being late, failing to participate, and knowingly/recklessly misleading the coroner (dishonesty and lack of integrity). The Tribunal accepted expert medical evidence (Dr Munro) that she was suffering from an undiagnosed condition causing partial sleep, confusion and impaired cognition/memory. It found her to be a completely reliable, honest and credible witness and that her statements were neither false nor misleading. The medical condition was held to be a defence to the competence/duty charges. All 6 charges were dismissed. Charge 1 (lateness) was dismissed as she had apologised and the explanation was credible. The Tribunal criticised the BSB for pursuing the case without instructing its own expert and for failing to check the transcript, noting the Respondent had an impeccable record and was 'beyond reproach.'
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]
Panel
Her Honour Janet Waddicor (Chair); Mr Scott McDonnell; Mrs Aaminah Khan; Ms Helen Norris; Ms Stephanie McIntosh
Duties engaged
- Overriding duty to the court
- Not mislead the court
- Disclose adverse law to the court
- No abuse of process or coercive powers
- Avoid wasting the court's time
- Proper basis for allegations
- No tampering with or coaching witnesses
- No payments to witnesses on evidence
- Comply with and respect court orders
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Professional independence
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Act in the client's best interests
- Fair, reasonable and lawful fees
- Competence
- Serve justice and improve the law
Documents
Source: https://www.tbtas.org.uk/hearings/findings-and-sentences-of-past-hearings/