§ discipline
‹ Back

Chinwe Uzo Chikwendu; Undiga Emuekpere

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12521/2023
Date27/04/2026
OutcomeReprimand, Suspend - Fixed Period

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Dishonesty foundYes

Two solicitors at Riverbrooke Solicitors faced allegations arising from an Employment Tribunal matter for Client A. Allegation 1 (joint) - preparing a grossly inflated bill of costs (£85,573.50 plus VAT) - was found NOT proved against either Respondent; the Tribunal was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the bill was grossly inflated, given limitations in the expert evidence and accepted (but non-determinative) time-recording shortcomings. Allegation 2, against the Second Respondent only, was found proved: she created a false and misleading attendance note (dated 29 July 2017) suggesting costs were discussed; the Tribunal found breaches of integrity, honesty and public trust. Allegation 3, against the First Respondent only, was found proved: failure to cooperate with the SRA in breach of paragraphs 7.3 and 7.4 of the Code. The First Respondent was reprimanded; the Second Respondent was suspended for two years.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Second Respondent acted dishonestly in creating the false attendance note

Mitigating factors:

  • Second Respondent undertook substantial genuine work on the matter
  • Aspects of the Second Respondent's evidence were candid, including admissions about poor timekeeping

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["unverified_suspension_months=24"]

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12521/