Decision record
J. Vernon (Jonathan) Ricketts
Allegation / charges
Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 22, 2006. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCILCOMPLAINT NO. 128/2005 In the Matter of FREDERICK MORRIS, MADGE MORRIS AND FREMADER AGENCIES LIMITED and …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Attorney Jonathan Vernon Ricketts was retained to obtain subdivision approval, splinter titles, and transfer nine lots to purchasers. He received $2,077,810.00 by February 2003 for stamp duty, registration fees and costs but failed to effect any transfers over three years, failed to account for or return the funds despite repeated demands, and failed to keep clients informed. The Committee found breaches of Canons I(b), IV(r), IV(s) and VII(b), constituting professional misconduct. While noting the seriousness citing Bolton v Law Society, the tribunal made no express finding of dishonesty. He was struck off the roll and ordered to pay restitution of $2,077,810.00 with 6% interest plus $80,000 costs.
Duties found breached:
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Act only on proper, lawful instructions
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
Aggravating factors:
- Held $2,077,810.00 for more than three years without accounting or completing transfers
- Failed to complete transfer of nine lots despite full payment of fees
- Ignored repeated verbal and written requests to hand over files and monies
- Funds impressed with a trust (stamp duty and registration fees) not used for their purpose
- Failed to attend hearings despite ample opportunity
- Severe embarrassment caused to complainants
Duties engaged
- Honesty
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Act only on proper, lawful instructions
- Disclose material information to client
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- Competence
- Diligence and timeliness
- Firm governance, systems and compliance
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/j-vernon-jonathan-ricketts-complaint-no-128-of-2005/