Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Andrew William Arthur Bartlett

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number6893/1995
Date01/01/1995
OutcomeSuspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Criminal Convictions

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 910
Dishonesty foundNo

The respondent, admitted in 1978 but not practising, was convicted at Preston Crown Court on 7 March 1995 of dangerous driving and driving with excess alcohol after a M55 collision that caused severe injuries to two people, and sentenced to six months imprisonment (concurrent) and two years disqualification. The Tribunal found the allegation of conduct unbefitting substantiated (uncontested), found his testimony unconvincing, and viewed the behaviour gravely. It refrained from striking-off partly because the conduct was not in the context of practice and due to uncertainties. It ordered indefinite suspension from 25 July 1995 and costs of £910. No express finding of dishonesty was made.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Serious offence causing severe injury to two people trapped for about an hour
  • Custodial sentence imposed
  • Adverse publicity describing him as a solicitor/lawyer
  • Tribunal found his testimony unconvincing and version of events inherently improbable

Mitigating factors:

  • Not acting dishonestly and not practising as a solicitor at the time
  • Left the profession three months before the accident
  • Was bankrupt and on income support
  • Had voluntarily not driven since the accident
  • Health and marital problems and business stress

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/6893/