Michael A. Williams
Allegation / charges
Struck off | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered December 12, 2009. View PDF JUDGMENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE COMPLAINT NO. 114/2005 DR. LLOYD BARNETT VS MICHAEL WILLIAMS PANEL:PAMELA BENKA-COKER Q.C.MERLIN BASSIEDANIELLA GENTLES THE COMPLAINT: By way of Form of Application …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Attorney Michael Williams failed to deliver accountant's reports to the General Legal Council for the years 1999-2005 and failed to pay practice certificate fees for 13 years (1986-1996, 2005, 2006) while continuing to practise. After multiple adjournments, he admitted the fee breaches and paid $104,250 by cheque, which was dishonoured; he later paid the full $119,700 owed. The panel found professional misconduct proven beyond reasonable doubt. For the practice-fee breaches it imposed a $50,000 fine, and for the unremedied accounts-regulations breaches it struck him from the Roll, plus $50,000 costs.
Duties found breached:
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- Report serious misconduct of others
- Good faith and courtesy to colleagues
- No improper fee-sharing or partnership
Aggravating factors:
- Sustained and continued breach over 13 years of basic obligation to pay practice fees, described as inexcusable and very grave
- Breaches of the Accounts and Records Regulations remained unremedied at the date of decision
- Failure to comply even when given repeated opportunities and adjournments
- Cheque tendered for practice fees was dishonoured by the bank
Mitigating factors:
- Attorney admitted the practice-fee breaches
- Attorney ultimately paid the full sum of $119,700 then due
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/michael-a-williams-complaint-no-114-of-2005/