§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Mark Raymond Donnelly

JurisdictionAustralia — Queensland
BodyLegal Services Commission (Queensland) (LSC-QLD)
Professionsolicitor — Donnelly Law Group
Date04.12.2025
HearingQueensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal
OutcomeReprimand; Pecuniary Penalty; Restriction on grant of practising cert.; Undertake Trust Accounting Course; Undertake Practice Management Course

Allegation / charges

The conduct the subject of charges 4, 5 and 6 of the discipline application filed 20 December 2024 constitutes professional misconduct

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionReprimand
Suspension12 months
FineAUD 7,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Solicitor Mark Donnelly faced six charges. Charges 1-3 (late lodgement of external examiner's trust reports over three years) were unsatisfactory professional conduct; charges 4-6 (breach of undertaking to QLS, knowingly supplying false information to QLS, and failing to exercise forensic judgment by filing an affidavit with explicit images in DFVP proceedings) were professional misconduct. The Tribunal made an express finding of dishonesty on charge 5. Adopting the parties' agreed sanction, the Tribunal ordered a public reprimand, a $7,000 pecuniary penalty, a 12-month bar on any practising certificate, mandatory ethics and practice management courses, a two-year bar on a principal practising certificate, and costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Multiplicity of charges including breach of undertaking and dishonesty
  • Repeated non-compliance despite reminders and assistance from QLS
  • Dishonesty on two occasions in misleading the regulator
  • Culture of repeated non-compliance and disregard of statutory obligations

Mitigating factors:

  • No client was harmed and trust accounts were in order
  • Personal difficulties including physical impairments from RAAF service, debt problems, insomnia and alcohol use
  • Sought professional help and undertook rehabilitation from August 2022
  • Expressed deep regret and remorse and accepted full responsibility
  • Full cooperation with the Commissioner
  • Held a genuine and accurate belief that the sensitive images had legitimate forensic value; no independent resource available to guide conduct on charge 6
  • Had practised responsibly for years prior

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://www.lsc.qld.gov.au/queensland-discipline-register