Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Fiona Jane Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12849/2025
Date18/08/2026
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Account Rules breaches, Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 41,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Fiona Jane Smith, co-founder, equity partner and COFA of MSP Legal Services LLP, admitted causing/allowing a client account shortage (£638,485.78 by 28 February 2023) and improper transfers of client money (£450,943.19 dissipated). She admitted dishonesty. The Tribunal, dealing with the matter on the papers via an agreed outcome, found the conduct deliberate, calculated and repeated with personal benefit from significant drawings, and found no exceptional circumstances. She was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £41,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Deliberate, calculated and repeated conduct over a period of time
  • Personal financial benefit through drawings (£196,501.04 in 2022 and £49,210.36 in early 2023)
  • Breach of a fundamental position of trust as COFA, manager and equity partner
  • Misconduct continued during ongoing SRA Forensic Investigation
  • High level of experience (admitted 2000)
  • Significant harm to Compensation Fund (paid out £983,783.21 across 23 claims)
  • Client money treated as sacrosanct was not safeguarded

Mitigating factors:

  • No prior history of misconduct
  • Difficulties managing the Firm during and after the Covid-19 pandemic
  • Retirement of longstanding bookkeeper and change in systems
  • Personal difficulties linked to family illness
  • Full admissions

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12849/