§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Jeremy Charles Barley

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9598/2006
Date01/01/2006
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 9,524
Dishonesty foundYes

Jeremy Charles Barley, a sole practitioner admitted in 1974, was found to have breached the Solicitors Accounts Rules by failing to deal properly with funds received from the Legal Services Commission for unpaid professional disbursements (a cash shortage of £47,889.06), and failing to remedy the breaches promptly. He also failed to account to Edward Fail solicitors for £4,953.23 in costs due to them, retaining the money in his office account where it was lost in his bankruptcy. The Tribunal found that his "not knowing or caring" whether money was wrongly held in office account, despite being put on notice by two FIO inspections, amounted to dishonesty (applying Bultitude). Despite mitigation (difficult circumstances, badly let down by colleagues/bookkeeper, ill health, esteem of profession), he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay agreed costs of £9,523.73.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Put on notice of bookkeeper's incompetence by two prior FIO inspections (2004 and 2005) yet failed to grasp the nettle
  • Failed to take immediate steps to account to Edward Fail even after Law Society sought an explanation
  • Cash shortage of £47,889.06 / 37 unpaid disbursements over a lengthy period (2001-2005)

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9598/