Potkonyak, George
Allegation / charges
<p>1. Conducted himself inappropriately in the Children's Court</p><p>2. Conducted himself inappropriately in the District Court</p><p>3. Breached his duty to the administration of justice by criticising the Children's Court</p><p>4. Misled the District Court</p><p>5. Breached his duty of care to his client</p><p>6. Consistently engaged in conduct falling short of the standard of competence and diligence</p> — Professional Misconduct
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The practitioner was found guilty of professional misconduct arising from inappropriate conduct in the Children's Court and District Court, breaching his duty to the administration of justice, misleading the District Court, breaching his duty of care to his client, and consistently falling short of the standard of competence and diligence. The text records no express finding of dishonesty and states no sanction, fine, or costs.
Duties found breached:
- Overriding duty to the court
- Not mislead the court
- No improper communication with the court
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Act in the client's best interests
- Competence
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=b55ea7df-b633-eb11-bf74-000d3ad1941e