§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Andrew Derrick John Farmiloe

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10257/2009
Date01/01/2009
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Delays, Failures, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 22,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Andrew Derrick John Farmiloe, a solicitor admitted in 1975, acted as trustee in the Optimum Returns (BFIG) high yield investment scheme. He released the entire trust fund (£9.452 million) to non-qualifying banks without obtaining adequate security, in breach of the trust terms he had himself drafted. The Tribunal proved allegations 1, 2, 3, 7 and 8, finding recklessness in allegations 1, 3 and 7. He gave investors assurances of little/no risk despite not understanding the Scheme and ignoring warnings from fund managers. The Tribunal expressly found he was credible, not ill-intentioned and NOT dishonest (he had been duped). Nonetheless, for protection of the public, he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay £22,000 costs (not enforceable without the Tribunal's leave given his bankruptcy).

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Released entire trust fund to non-qualifying banks in breach of trust terms he himself had drafted
  • Reckless conduct found in releasing funds without adequate security
  • Ignored multiple warning signs from fund managers questioning the Scheme's legitimacy
  • Scheme exhibited characteristics of fraudulent transactions (high yield investment fraud) which he agreed with
  • Failed to disclose matters to firm's Risk Committee despite attending meetings
  • Significant sums involved (over £9.4 million)
  • Experienced solicitor of 34 years' qualification

Mitigating factors:

  • Tribunal found him a credible and not ill-intentioned witness
  • No finding of dishonesty - he was found to have been duped
  • Did not benefit financially from the Scheme
  • Acting under significant work pressures and personal pressures (house move, elderly mother)
  • Investors were ultimately repaid by Trident's insurers
  • Expressed remorse and accepted responsibility
  • Allegations 4, 5 and 6 were not proved

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10257/