§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Philip Simon Hogg

JurisdictionScotland
BodyScottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal (SSDT)
Professionsolicitor — Philip Simon Hogg, residing at 9 Crossdykes, Kirkintilloch
Date25th Aug 2016
AppealNo Appeal

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
Suspension60 months
Dishonesty foundNo

Philip Simon Hogg, a partner in the two-partner firm Alder Hogg, was found guilty of professional misconduct for failing to supervise the firm's office manager/cashier (his brother-in-law) and failing to ensure compliance with the accounts rules, which resulted in substantial overcharging of executry clients (net claim of about £118,910 admitted by the Guarantee Fund) and the client account being continually in deficit. He also continued drawing from the firm while it was financed by overcharges. He pleaded guilty. The Tribunal expressly found no dishonesty, describing his conduct as reckless and naive, but suspended him from practice for five years to reflect the gravity. He was found liable for the expenses of the Complainers and Tribunal, taxed on an agent and client basis, and client identities were excluded from publicity.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Overcharging totalling around £90,128 on the Mr and Mrs A executry alone, with net claim of about £118,910 admitted by the Guarantee Fund
  • Client account continually in deficit from 1 October 2008 until appointment of judicial factor
  • Long period over which transactions occurred and their regularity
  • Signed six-monthly accounts certificates 'on trust' without reviewing accounts
  • Continued drawings while taking no responsibility to check the source
  • Firm continued to employ Kenneth Greer as cashier despite prior issues, requiring high degree of supervision

Mitigating factors:

  • No dishonesty alleged or found; conduct found to be reckless and naive
  • Unblemished record card; no prior similar matters
  • Another partner (his sister, the cashroom partner) was directly responsible for the work
  • Overcharging was concealed from the Respondent; no actual knowledge
  • Cooperated fully with the Law Society and others to ensure smooth transition of files to the Judicial Factor
  • Severe personal consequences - lost his firm, career and livelihood
  • Plea of guilty tendered
  • Sister's ill health and challenging recessionary period

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://www.ssdt.org.uk/findings/law-society-v-philip-simon-hogg/