Paul Francis Fallon
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Paul Francis Fallon, sole principal of City Law Financial LLP, faced eight allegations all of which were found proved (save for dishonesty on allegation 1.3). He received client monies earmarked for counsel's fees from three sets of clients and used them for the firm's or his own purposes without paying counsel; made false statements to clients about counsel's fees and about an adverse costs order; redirected a business rate rebate to his ex-wife's account; exercised higher rights of audience before being certified; retained a duplicate payment; practised without a valid practising certificate; and failed to manage the firm properly (no second LLP member, files left to landlord). The Tribunal found express dishonesty on allegations 1.1, 1.2, 1.5.2 and 1.6, including misappropriation of client funds. He did not attend the final day or offer mitigation. With no exceptional circumstances, he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay summarily assessed costs of £160,000, not to be enforced without leave of the Tribunal (he was in receipt of Jobseeker's Allowance).
Duties found breached:
- Proper basis for allegations
- No improper questioning of witnesses
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Hold a current practising certificate
Aggravating factors:
- Multiple findings of dishonesty including misappropriation of client funds, the most serious form of misconduct
- Dishonesty perpetrated against a number of different clients
- Respondent showed no insight into his conduct and only conceded one false statement should have been corrected
- Displayed a worrying arrogance towards clients and his professional obligations throughout the trial
- Misconduct touched almost every aspect of his practice over an eight-month period
Mitigating factors:
- No previous disciplinary matters
- Firm was suffering from severe cash flow difficulties partly caused by a client's (D's) repeated failure to pay, against the backdrop of the Greek economic crisis
Duties engaged
- Overriding duty to the court
- Not mislead the court
- Proper basis for allegations
- No improper questioning of witnesses
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Not mislead third parties or opponents
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Advise objectively, not a mere conduit
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Hold a current practising certificate
- Pay instructed practitioners and agents
- Serve justice and improve the law