Ms Asha MCLAREN
Allegation / charges
Findings of professional misconduct Reasons for decision Reasons for penalty Appeal decision
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Asha McLaren, a legal practitioner, appealed against the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal's finding that she engaged in professional misconduct by making serious allegations that the firm Cridlands and three of its practitioners had breached fiduciary duties to their client (the Uniting Church) by misusing confidential information, without instructions and without supporting evidentiary material. The Full Court (Martin CJ, Mildren and Riley JJ) found the Tribunal had jurisdiction, and although some findings (relating to authority/instructions to lodge the general complaint, and reversal of onus of proof) were set aside as erroneous, the core findings—that she lacked specific instructions to make the personal allegations and had no evidentiary material to support the three allegations, yet maintained them—were upheld. The Tribunal had characterised the allegations as tantamount to fraud, but Mildren J held this characterisation could not be sustained; importantly the misconduct was making serious unsupported allegations, not a finding of dishonesty against McLaren herself. The finding of professional misconduct stood and the appeal was dismissed with costs. The penalty imposed by the Tribunal was not appealed.
Duties found breached:
Aggravating factors:
- Allegations accused three solicitors of very serious breaches of ethical conduct (characterised by the Tribunal as amounting to fraudulent conduct)
- Allegations were maintained on three further occasions and expanded upon despite known absence of evidence
- Practitioner had ample opportunity to withdraw the allegations and chose not to do so
- Practitioner was aware (from a file note about lack of 'concrete proof') that the Church could not provide evidence to support the allegations
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]
Duties engaged
Documents
Source: https://lawsocietynt.asn.au/index.php/disciplinary-action-register-public-reprimands/