Lorraine Earle
Allegation / charges
Struck of f, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered April 04, 2009. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL COMPLAINT NO. 101 OF 2003 IN THE MATTER OF A COMPLAINT BY GRACE PEART …
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The complainant retained the respondent attorney to incorporate a company, make two visa applications, and carry out probate/administration work to transfer two land titles, paying her sums totalling $212,500. The respondent did none of the work, failed to account for the money, did not return valuable documents (titles and passports), and ceased communicating with the complainant. She also induced the complainant to cash a $50,000 cheque drawn on an account that had been closed, which was dishonoured, and never reimbursed it. The respondent did not respond to the complaint or appear at any hearing. The Panel found her guilty of professional misconduct in breach of Canons IV(r), IV(s), VII(b)(ii) and I(b). She was struck off the Roll (though already struck off in March 2006), ordered to make restitution of $262,500 plus interest from 21 February 2003, and to pay costs of $20,000.
Duties found breached:
- No taking unfair advantage
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
Aggravating factors:
- Respondent did not respond to the complaint
- Respondent failed to appear or be represented at any hearing
- Multiple matters involving multiple sums of money entrusted
- Fraudulent encashment of a cheque drawn on a closed account
- Failure to return valuable documents including titles and passports
- Ceased all communication with the client
Duties engaged
- Honesty
- No taking unfair advantage
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- Disclose material information to client
- Keep client informed and respond promptly
- No conflict between current clients
- No improper use of client money
- Prompt accounting and return of money
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- Competence
- Diligence and timeliness
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/lorraine-earle-complaint-no-101-of-2003/