§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Ogbondah Kkem Omodu

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10788/2011
Date01/01/2011
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 40,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Sole practitioner of W&J Solicitors faced allegations including Solicitors Accounts Rules breaches, failure to report material facts to lenders, involvement in transactions bearing hallmarks of mortgage fraud, false statements on a PII proposal form, and sham partnerships. The Tribunal found all allegations proved (some in part). It made express findings of dishonesty on allegation 1.2 (deliberately misleading lender BM over ~10 months by concealing misapplication of mortgage funds and allowing an incorrect Certificate of Title to stand) and allegation 1.4 (falsifying a professional indemnity insurance proposal form). Dishonesty was not proved on the mortgage-fraud-hallmarks and sham-partnership allegations. The Respondent was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £40,000 (inclusive of VAT), not to be enforced without leave of the Tribunal.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonest concealment from lender (BM) sustained over approximately 10 months
  • Allowed an incorrect Certificate of Title to stand misleading the lender
  • Falsification of professional indemnity insurance proposal form while under investigation and on police bail
  • Numerous transactions bearing hallmarks of mortgage fraud involving a known fraudster client using aliases
  • Failure to report material facts to lender clients and ignoring their best interests

Mitigating factors:

  • Previous good character supported by testimonials
  • No mixing of client money with own money
  • No suggestion of personal profiteering or motive of gain
  • No client loss; transactions ultimately completed and registered
  • Allegation 1.2 dishonesty arose from covering up an originally honest mistake
  • No previous appearances before the Tribunal

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10788/