§ discipline
‹ Back

Gerard Christopher Mann & Katherine Jane Bradford

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11251/2014
Date01/01/2014
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 27,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Two partners at Stoffel & Co admitted breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules involving unallocated transfers from client to office account, withdrawals creating shortages (initial shortage of £139,540.49, later further shortages), failure to remedy promptly, and improper use of client funds. Both denied dishonesty. The Tribunal found dishonesty proved against both under the Twinsectra test, concluding they deliberately transferred client funds to keep the office account within its overdraft limit without first sending bills, knowing they were not entitled to the money. Both were struck off the Roll and ordered to pay £27,000 costs jointly and severally. Deferment of sanction refused; filing suspended only until 5pm same day.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Tribunal found both Respondents acted dishonestly
  • Misconduct was deliberate and repeated over several months
  • Continued making unallocated transfers after first SRA investigation had warned them such conduct breached the rules
  • Knew or ought to have known conduct was in material breach of obligations to protect public and reputation of profession
  • Transfers used to keep office account within overdraft limit and to pay First Respondent's mortgage

Mitigating factors:

  • Replaced the cash shortage in full
  • Cooperated fully with the regulator
  • Made open and frank admissions to allegations 1.1-1.4 at an early stage
  • Showed insight by accepting they should not have acted as they did
  • Long careers and many years of service to their community
  • Suffered considerably financially as a result of their conduct
  • Previous 1991 appearance not culpable and on different allegations

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11251/