Howard Victor Stone
Allegation / charges
Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Others, Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Howard Victor Stone, a sole practitioner admitted in 1978, faced seven allegations arising from his handling of funds in property transactions for a Swiss company (RTC) and its managed BVI company (MPL). The Tribunal found proved breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules (failure to keep proper records, cash shortages, improper transfers), withdrawing client monies for costs when not entitled, and knowingly overcharging. Critically, it found the Respondent had deceived another firm (D Solicitors) by setting up a supposed joint escrow account under his sole control and withdrawing over £200,000 for his own fees, and that he had fabricated/grossly inflated bills (billing ~£196,000 against ~£29,000 reasonable). Express findings of dishonesty were made on allegations 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6 applying the Twinsectra test. Allegation 1.4 was not proved. The Respondent withdrew from the hearing before giving evidence. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs of £83,616.63.
Duties found breached:
- Accounting records, reconciliation and reports
- No improper use of client money
- No taking unfair advantage
- Proper basis for allegations
Aggravating factors:
- Systematic and prolonged misconduct over a significant period
- Calculated deception of another solicitor (D Solicitors) regarding the nature of the BOS escrow account
- Defalcation of approximately £200,000 from a fund meant to be preserved pending resolution of a dispute
- Grossly inflated/fabricated billing (bills of ~£196,000 against ~£29,000 reasonable costs; ~85% overcharge)
- Use of client funds to pay his firm's debts and outgoings, and to pay an individual's (Mr RA) personal legal costs
- Withdrawing from proceedings immediately before giving evidence; attempt to stave off proceedings to enable further practice before retirement
Mitigating factors:
- No previous disciplinary findings against the Respondent
- Over 35 years in the profession
- Made some admissions (accounts breaches and a lack of integrity regarding the BOS account)