§ discipline
‹ Back

Timothy Schools

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10968/2012
Date01/01/2012
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 60,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Timothy Paul Schools, a solicitor and director of ATM Solicitors Ltd specialising in unenforceable Consumer Credit Act claims, faced multiple allegations arising from conflicts of interest, undisclosed interests in connected companies (CM Audits, SY UK/IOM, the AX Fund), inappropriate proximity to introducer K, failure to monitor introducers, exploitative third-party funding arrangements (AX and TR Funds), liens over client files in favour of funders, unenforceable ATE policies with an unregulated Isle of Man insurer, and inadequate books of account. The hearing proceeded in his absence after repeated adjournment applications were refused. The Tribunal found almost all allegations proved, including lack of integrity (Rule 1.02) and recklessness, but expressly found no dishonesty. Given the seriousness, his prior similar disciplinary history and lack of insight, he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs subject to detailed assessment with an interim payment of £60,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Two previous appearances before the Tribunal, the first involving similar findings (failing to act in clients' best interests, referral arrangements, conflict of interest)
  • Misconduct was deliberate and continued over a period of time
  • Motivated by financial gain, preferring his own financial interests over clients' interests
  • No admissions, no insight and no mitigation offered
  • Substantial departure from the integrity, probity and trustworthiness expected of a solicitor

Mitigating factors:

  • No dishonesty was alleged or found
  • Eventually terminated the relationship with introducer K
  • Reversed out of the ATE insurance arrangement with U and provided proper cover once the issue was raised
  • Rectified accounting deficiencies by April 2010

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10968/