Patricia Fox
Allegation / charges
Others
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The Respondent, a non-solicitor clerk at Charles Kirit & Co, received £12,100 from a client (Mr W) and his wife to satisfy a confiscation order but kept the money in her personal account rather than the firm's client account, without informing her supervisors. She was dismissed for gross misconduct and repaid the £12,100 on 31 January 2006, which was forwarded to the Confiscation Unit. The Tribunal found allegations 1-3 substantiated (uncontested; allegation 4 withdrawn). It accepted she had not sought to deprive Mr W of his money but had acted extremely foolishly; police took no further action. No express finding of dishonesty was made. A Section 43 order was imposed and she was ordered to pay costs of £1,316.
Duties found breached:
Mitigating factors:
- Did not seek to deprive the client of his money; acted foolishly rather than dishonestly
- Repaid the full £12,100
- Replied promptly to all correspondence and instructed a solicitor
- Positive written testimonials as to honesty, integrity and competence
- Eight years' service as a solicitor's clerk
- Police investigated and took no further action
- Her actions had no effect on the client's term of imprisonment
- Had not worked for some twenty months
- Did not contest the allegations or the making of the Order