§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Stephen Wilbert Dermont Sam & Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9531/2006
Date01/01/2006
OutcomeReprimand, Strike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 40,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Two partners of Sam Moseley & Co faced allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor arising from Law Society investigations revealing serious client account deficiencies and a conflict of interest. The First Respondent (Sam) was found to have acted in a conflict of interest through his interest in AGMS, made unauthorised inter-client transfers (teeming and lading), and used clients' money (notably £57,798 from O Property Limited) to pay the firm's PAYE. The Tribunal expressly found his conduct dishonest to the high standard required and struck him off the Roll, ordering £40,000 costs. The Second Respondent was found liable as a partner for the accounts breaches but no dishonesty was alleged or found; given strong mitigation he was reprimanded and ordered to pay £10,000 costs. One allegation was withdrawn and another (failure to deliver an Accountant's Report) left on file due to the accountant's lien on the papers.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Express finding of dishonesty against the First Respondent (Twinsectra test met to high standard)
  • Use of client funds without consent (O Property Limited and Mr D)
  • Systematic inter-client transfers/teeming and lading to disguise debit balances
  • First Respondent's continued failure to accept the conflict of interest and cavalier attitude to stewardship of client funds
  • Minimum cash shortage of at least £179,258.55 on client account

Mitigating factors:

  • For Second Respondent: no dishonesty alleged or found; relied on partner and experienced bookkeeper; had set up accounting systems; did everything possible to put matters right; severe financial and professional loss including bankruptcy and loss of home; ensured no client suffered loss; positive references
  • Shortage was ultimately rectified in full by the second inspection

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9531/