§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Oswald Paul David James

JurisdictionJamaica
BodyGeneral Legal Council — Disciplinary Committee (GLC)
Professionattorney
Case number106 of 2008
DateSeptember 11, 2012
OutcomeStruck off, Restitution Ordered

Allegation / charges

Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered September 11, 2012. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL LEGAL COUNCIL Complaint No. 106/2008 IN THE MATTER of a complaint by PROSPOREX LIMITED INC. against MR. …

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsJMD 100,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Prosporex Limited Inc., through director Carl Lewis, retained attorney Oswald James and sent him U$337,500 in connection with the purchase of property (Villa Maria). When that transaction failed, Lewis demanded the return of the funds. The attorney claimed he had oral instructions to invest the money in the Queen Hill development, but produced no agreement, title, mortgage or security in the client's name, and the documents he relied on were prepared after the money was paid out and were unsigned by the vendor. He repaid only U$100,000 and gave a written undertaking to return the U$237,500 balance by 30 July 2008, which he did not honour. The Committee, applying the criminal standard of proof, found the Complainant's witnesses truthful and the attorney less than frank, rejected his account, and found him in breach of Canon VII(b)(ii) for failing to account to his client. No express finding of dishonesty was made. The attorney was struck off the Roll, ordered to make restitution of U$237,500 with 3% interest from 15 April 2008, and to pay costs of J$100,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Large sum of client money involved (U$337,500, balance of U$237,500 unrefunded)
  • Money still not refunded as at date of decision
  • Attorney gave a professional undertaking and failed to honour it
  • Conduct that brings the profession into disrepute
  • Attorney found to be less than frank in his account of events

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • Decision 2016-12-07 · LSO-T · Canada — Ontario · Reasons

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://www.generallegalcouncil.org/judgement/oswald-paul-david-james-complaint-no-106-of-2008/