§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Andrew Norman Payne

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7289/1996
Date01/01/1996
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 2,556
Dishonesty foundNo

Andrew Norman Payne, a sole practitioner admitted in 1977, was found guilty of conduct unbefitting a solicitor for serious mishandling and misappropriation of clients' and controlled trust funds. An Investigation Accountant's report revealed numerous false and misleading entries and a minimum shortfall of clients' and trust funds of £763,956.60, comprising improper transfers to office account (£300,375), misuse of funds in the estate of B deceased (£112,593) and controlled trust funds in the matter of T deceased (£50,000). Funds were taken for his own use and benefit, including diverting cheques meant for beneficiaries and using monies to conceal earlier misuse. The respondent did not appear but had admitted the matters in correspondence. The Tribunal found all allegations substantiated, called it an appalling case, and ordered him struck off the Roll and to pay fixed costs of £2,555.98 inclusive. Although the Law Society intervened on grounds of suspected dishonesty and the conduct plainly involved misappropriation, the Tribunal made no express finding of dishonesty in its reasoning.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Very large sums involved with minimum shortfall exceeding £763,000
  • Misconduct continued over a long period, at least as far back as 1990
  • Diversion of beneficiaries' cheques and use of funds to conceal earlier misuse
  • Misuse of controlled trust monies belonging to charities
  • Substantial loss to clients and the Compensation Fund (over £587,000 in pending claims plus further unquantified claims)

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7289/