§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Lesley Dixon

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number6785/1995
Date01/01/1995
OutcomeS.43 Order (clerks)

Allegation / charges

Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionConditions
CostsGBP 1,351
Dishonesty foundNo

Lesley Dixon, a solicitor's clerk at Oxley & Coward, forged on an affidavit both the signature of her divorce client and the signature of a solicitor purportedly administering the oath, then filed it at Doncaster County Court. The allegation was not contested and the Tribunal found it substantiated. The Tribunal made a controlling order under Section 43(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974 prohibiting any solicitor from employing her without the Law Society's written permission, and ordered her to pay costs of £1,351.25. The Tribunal expressed sympathy, accepting she acted out of character under extreme workload pressure and the demands of a difficult client, but held no pressure could excuse forgery and misleading the court. No express finding of dishonesty was recorded.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Forgery of two signatures (client and another solicitor)
  • Deceived the court, the client and another party
  • Caused the forged affidavit to be filed at court, requiring a further hearing to resolve the difficulties

Mitigating factors:

  • Full, frank explanation and apology
  • Conduct was an isolated incident, not a course of conduct, and entirely out of character
  • Competent and hard-working clerk subjected to an unsettling office move and successive staff departures resulting in an overwhelming workload
  • Acted under great pressure from an extraordinarily difficult and demanding client
  • Personal/family stress (concerns over mother and grandmother; difficulty sleeping)
  • Gained no benefit from her actions; already suffered consequences (dismissal, substantial drop in salary, inability to find legal employment)
  • Supported by a former employer and another local firm

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/6785/