§ discipline
‹ Back

David Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11499/2016
Date01/01/2016
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 3,475
Dishonesty foundYes

The Respondent, a solicitor with over 35 years' experience practising as a partner at Linder Myers, misused £80,000 of client A's money (from the sale of A's business) between 16 December 2013 and 27 March 2014 to pay a costs order owed by an unconnected client B, in order to avoid a threatened negligence claim against himself. He made four unauthorised "Fastpay" transfers and prepared false and misleading narratives on the payment request forms to conceal the wrongdoing. He admitted both allegations including dishonesty. The Tribunal found both allegations and dishonesty proved beyond reasonable doubt. Despite mitigation (no personal financial gain, restitution made, genuine remorse, unblemished 35-year career, personal stress and family health issues), the misconduct was at the highest level and the only appropriate sanction was striking off. He was ordered to pay costs of £3,474.65.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Admitted dishonesty
  • Misconduct was deliberate, calculated and repeated over a three-month period
  • Concealment of wrongdoing from the firm's internal accounts department and potentially auditors
  • Very high level of culpability given 35 years' experience and partner-level sole responsibility
  • Did not inform the firm of the improper transfers when he left

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary matters; previously unblemished 35-year career
  • Out-of-character conduct
  • No personal financial gain
  • Made full restitution of the shortfall from his own funds
  • Genuine insight and remorse
  • Early and comprehensive admissions and cooperation with the firm and SRA
  • Acting under intense personal and professional pressure including family health issues

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11499/