§ discipline
‹ Back

Peter Kenneth Felton Gerber

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12625/2024
Date12/02/2025
OutcomeFine

Allegation / charges

Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionFine
FineGBP 45,000
CostsGBP 60,000
Dishonesty foundNo

Sole practitioner and COLP/COFA/MLRO of Feltons Law faced allegations relating to AML compliance failures, false statements to insurers and the SRA about AML training and a firm-wide risk assessment, use of the client account as a banking facility (£4.4m), and failure to return residual client funds promptly. He admitted the factual/technical breaches but denied dishonesty, lack of integrity and recklessness. The Tribunal expressly found he was NOT dishonest, accepting his beliefs were genuinely (though unreasonably) held, but found lack of integrity and recklessness, with all breaches proved (dishonesty not proved on Allegations 1.1 and 1.3). Sanction: £45,000 fine plus indefinite practising restrictions (suspended until 4 April 2025), and costs of £60,000.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Misconduct embedded and persisted over several years without remedy
  • Failed to take remedial action despite shortcomings being pointed out by the FIO and others (took at least two further years)
  • Conduct found to be reckless
  • Experienced solicitor who should have known better
  • Placed clients at risk
  • Limited insight into potential harm to clients

Mitigating factors:

  • No dishonesty found
  • No improper gain and no loss to any party
  • No complaints or claims against him
  • 33 years of unblemished practice; first appearance before the Tribunal
  • Strong character references
  • Full cooperation with the SRA
  • Early admissions to factual matters and Accounts Rule breaches
  • Genuine remorse; struggling as a sole practitioner
  • Eventually became fully compliant

⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["review_dishonesty_finding_cue_present"]

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12625/