§ discipline
‹ Back

Muhammad Azfar Ahmad

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number12619/2024
Date12/03/2026
OutcomeNot Proved/Dismissed

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionDismissed
Dishonesty foundNo

An undercover Daily Mail investigation covertly recorded a 27 June 2023 preliminary meeting in which operatives, one posing as an irregular migrant, sought immigration advice from the Respondent solicitor. The SRA alleged he suggested (1) a false asylum narrative (fear for life) and (2) a sham marriage to regularise immigration status. The Tribunal treated the videos as the primary record and approached the multi-stage Punjabi-to-Urdu-to-English translations with significant caution. It found the operatives had led/framed the discussion contrary to their own instructions, that the Respondent gave repeated caveats that asylum for Indian nationals was 'very weak' and 'not in his hands,' and that his responses were reactive, illustrative and conditional rather than prescriptive directions. The pleaded wording required proof that conduct 'should' (not merely 'could') occur. Both allegations were found NOT PROVED on the balance of probabilities; breaches of the Principles and Code were therefore not considered. The Respondent's application for costs was refused, with no order made against the SRA which had acted in good faith.

Codes & rules applied

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/12619/