Decision record
PAUL ERNEST MASTEN
Allegation / charges
Professional Misconduct
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Sole practitioner Paul Ernest Masten used $11,115 of estate trust money to pay stamp duty on a land purchase by his own company (Noble House), knowing there were no funds to which he was entitled, then caused a false debit entry to be made in the estate's trust ledger. The Tribunal expressly found dishonest and illegal conduct (stealing and fraudulent falsification of records), intentional breach of trust, and contraventions of ss 216(1), 226(1)(a), 228(3)(b) and 227(1) of the LP Act, holding him guilty of professional misconduct. On penalty, the reconstituted Tribunal (President Chaney) found the conduct went to fitness to practise and transmitted a report to the Supreme Court (Full Bench) recommending removal from the roll, suspended his practising certificate pending that determination, and ordered costs of $38,502.25 payable within three months.
Duties found breached:
- Honesty
- No conflict between current clients
- Self-report to the regulator
- Report serious misconduct of others
- No baseless or threatened misconduct report
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonest conduct continued over a period (10 April to 12 May 2009)
- Withdrawal of trust money used for the practitioner's own personal benefit via his company Noble House
- Deliberate falsification of the estate's trust ledger
- Failure to rectify the wrongful debit despite several opportunities until a day after learning of the Committee's investigation
- Misuse of trust funds - conduct occurring in the course of legal practice
- Practitioner evasive and argumentative as a witness; version of events disbelieved
Mitigating factors:
- Considerable personal and professional stress at the relevant time (marital breakdown, partnership dispute, relocation, financial pressure)
- No prior disciplinary findings or complaints in over five years of practice
- The estate ultimately suffered no financial loss (money repaid)
- Cooperated with the trust inspector's investigation and did not conceal the file
- Positive character references and community contributions
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.