Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

H W Endeley, D J Stevenson & Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9380/2005
Date01/01/2005
OutcomeNo Order, Strike off, Strike Off Register of Foreign Lawyers

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Delays, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 20,686
Dishonesty foundYes

Three Respondents practised in a multi-national partnership (Pinnacle Solicitors). FIU reports revealed cash shortages, client money paid into office account and used for their own benefit, and accounts not properly kept. The Tribunal found the First Respondent had written a deliberately misleading letter to a client and expressly found dishonesty satisfying the Twinsectra test. The First Respondent was struck off the Register of Foreign Lawyers and the Second Respondent struck off the Roll of Solicitors, jointly and severally liable for costs of £20,685.64. An Adjudicator's compensation direction (Mrs O, £162,467.29 paid from compensation fund) was made enforceable as a High Court order. The Third Respondent, found to be an innocent victim who admitted only accounts breaches by virtue of her partner status, received no order and the Tribunal recommended review of conditions on her practising certificate. Allegation (viii) against the First and (xii) against the Third were withdrawn.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Rolling unreplaced client account shortages
  • Utilising clients' funds for own benefit
  • Lack of cooperation throughout disciplinary proceedings by First and Second Respondents (non-attendance, no substantive response)
  • A ledger created to answer FIU queries

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9380/