Nagle, Peter Richard
Allegation / charges
1. Engaged in legal practice in the period since 1 July 2016, contrary to section 10 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law<BR/>2. Represented himself as entitled to engage in legal practice in the period since 1 July 2016, contrary to section 11 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law<BR/>3. Continued to represent three co-accused in a criminal matter after he became aware that the interests of at least two of the co-accused were in conflict — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The practitioner was found to have engaged in legal practice and represented himself as entitled to do so without entitlement since 1 July 2016 (contrary to ss 10 and 11 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law), and to have continued representing three co-accused after becoming aware of a conflict of interest between at least two of them, amounting to unsatisfactory professional conduct. No express finding of dishonesty is recorded and the provided text does not state the sanction imposed.
Duties found breached:
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- No conflict between current clients
- Hold a current practising certificate
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
No documents recorded.
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=672e510a-b733-eb11-bf74-000d3ad1941e