Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026

The duty in context

No unlawful discrimination or harassment integrity

The lawyer must not unlawfully discriminate, victimise, bully or harass any person on protected grounds, in service delivery or professional relationships.

813 cases 73% strike-off avg suspension 11.3 mo avg fine 4,500 2 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code Principle 6; CCS 1.1; CCS 1.5 strong 762 cases
1.6 in a way that encourages equality, diversity and inclusion. 1.1 You do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services. 1.5 You treat colleagues fairly and with respect. You do not bully or harass them or discriminate unfairly against them.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook CD8; rC12 strong 14 cases
CD8 You must not discriminate unlawfully against any person. rC12 You must not discriminate unlawfully against, victimise or harass any other person on the grounds of race, colour, ethnic or national origin, nationality, citizenship, sex, gender re-assignment, sexual orientation, marital or civil partnership status, disability, age, religion or belief, or pregnancy and maternity.
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 no clear equivalent
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 42.1 strong 16 cases
A solicitor must not in the course of, or in connection with, legal practice or their profession, engage in conduct which constitutes: 42.1.1 discrimination, 42.1.2 sexual harassment, or 42.1.3 any other form of harassment, or 42.1.4 workplace bullying.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch6 — Discrimination strong
A solicitor should not discriminate against any person, whether clients, counsel, professional or other witnesses, or opposing parties because of their gender, civil status, family status, sexual orientation, religion, age, disability, race, or membership of the Traveller community.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 3.3; Rule 7.2; Rule 7.4 strong
Barristers shall not discriminate in favour of or against any person availing, or seeking to avail, of the services of the Barrister on the grounds of race, colour, sex, sexual orientation, language, politics, religion, nationality, national or social origin, national minority, birth or other status and it shall be the professional duty of Barristers to comply with all laws intended to prevent any discrimination on any grounds.
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics no clear equivalent
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code no clear equivalent
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 6.3.1-1; r 6.3-3 strong
6.3.1-1 A lawyer has a special responsibility to respect the requirements of human rights laws in force in Ontario and, specifically, to honour the obligation not to discriminate on the grounds of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, record of offences ... [6.3-3 A lawyer shall not sexually harass a colleague, a staff member, a client, or any other person.]
BC Lawyers BC Code r 6.3-3 to 6.3-5 strong 4 cases
6.3-3 A lawyer must not sexually harass any person. 6.3-4 A lawyer must not engage in any other form of harassment of any person. 6.3-5 A lawyer must not discriminate against any person.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 10.3 strong
A lawyer must not engage in conduct that amounts to 1 or more of the following: (a) bullying: (b) discrimination: (c) harassment: (d) racial harassment: (e) sexual harassment: (f) violence.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.15 strong 6 cases
You must not discriminate on the grounds of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex or sexual orientation in your professional dealings with other lawyers, clients, employees or others
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 no clear equivalent
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 5.01 Commentary 1 partial
A solicitor should not refuse to accept instructions based upon the race, colour, ethnic or national origins, sex or religious or political beliefs of a prospective client.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 10.1 strong
A practising barrister must not, in the course of practice, engage in conduct which constitutes unlawful discrimination or harassment.

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

776 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Fiona Hunter Blair Parsons
    SDT solicitor 12938/2026 2026-09-25 rule cited

    Criminal Convictions, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Zeeshan Saqib Mian
    SDT solicitor 12824/2025 2026-09-07 rule cited

    Breaches, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12934/2026 2026-09-03 rule cited
    Restoration to the Roll - Refused 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12935/2026 2026-09-03 found breached text match
    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • Md Towhidul Islam
    SDT solicitor 12819/2025 2026-08-25 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Gordon Mcpherson Keir
    SDT solicitor 12807/2025 2026-08-25 rule cited

    Account Rules breaches, Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Pr…

    Reprimand 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12929/2026 2026-08-25 rule cited
    S.44E/ S.46/Paragraph 14C Appeals 1 PDF View decision
  • Elizabeth Forrest
    SDT solicitor 12838/2025 2026-08-05 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Julian Condliffe
    SDT solicitor 12689/2024 2026-08-05 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • James Swead; John Szepietowski
    SDT solicitor 12472/2023 2026-08-04 rule cited

    Account Rules breaches, Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 2 PDFs View decision
  • Shezhad Ilyas
    SDT solicitor 12822/2025 2026-07-24 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12909/2026 2026-07-21 rule cited
    S.44E/ S.46/Paragraph 14C Appeals 1 PDF View decision
  • Anthony David Davis
    SDT solicitor 12867/2025 2026-07-21 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Not Proved/Dismissed 2 PDFs View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12921/2026 2026-07-21 rule cited
    S.44E/ S.46/Paragraph 14C Appeals 1 PDF View decision
  • Adrian Robert Berkeley
    SDT solicitor 12866/2025 2026-07-21 text match

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Ryan Sean Jack Williams
    SDT solicitor 12657/2024 2026-07-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Sexual Misconduct, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Shashi Patel
    SDT solicitor 12837/2025 2026-06-16 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Firms 2019, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Money Laundering Regulations, Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, …

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mark Grenville Davies
    SDT solicitor 12796/2025 2026-06-09 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Sarinjit Singh Bahia
    SDT solicitor 12574/2024 2026-06-09 rule cited

    Account Rules breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2011, S…

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Raymond John McKeeve
    SDT solicitor 12736/2025 2026-06-08 rule cited

    Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Johanna Morris
    BTAS barrister Middle Temple 2026-05-29 text match
    Final 2 PDFs View decision
  • Darren Shaw
    SDT solicitor 12804/2025 2026-05-28 found breached text match

    Solicitors Act 1974

    S.43 Order (clerks) 1 PDF View decision
  • John Kishin Navani
    SDT solicitor 12555/2024 2026-05-21 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011

    Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Jonathan Lea
    SDT solicitor 12845/2025 2026-05-21 rule cited

    SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Suspended period of Suspension 1 PDF View decision
  • Robert Mannering Sedgwick
    SDT solicitor 12806/2025 2026-05-12 rule cited

    Breaches, Code of Conduct 2011, SRA Principles 2011, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.