Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Anthony David Murphy

JurisdictionScotland
BodyScottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal (SSDT)
Professionsolicitor — Antony David Murphy formerly of 31 Chapel Street, Hamilton. Lanarkshire now of 3 Chateau Grove, Hamilton, Lanarkshire
Date14th Sept 2011
AppealNo Appeal

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Dishonesty foundNo

Antony David Murphy, a Hamilton solicitor, was found guilty of professional misconduct on multiple grounds: knowingly permitting a client (Company A) to sell development land to a third party despite concluded missives with off-plan purchasers, causing purchasers financial loss; falsely telling the Law Society his accounting records had been destroyed in a flood; recklessly clearing about £116,200 of client funds from his client account using contrived fee notes; failing to account to liquidators; and a client account shortfall exceeding £8,000 (Rule 4 breach). Although the Fiscal alleged dishonesty, the Tribunal expressly declined to make findings of dishonesty (finding conduct reckless and putting his integrity in severe doubt but not proven dishonest). The Tribunal struck his name off the Roll and awarded expenses against him (taxed, no fixed sum), with publicity including his name.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Removal of approximately £116,200 of client monies to which he was not entitled
  • Deliberate/thought out process of clearing client account on 4 November 2008 using contrived sequential fee notes
  • Providing false information to his professional body
  • Intromitting with company funds after liquidators appointed without authority
  • Financial disadvantage caused to purchasers who did not recover full deposits

Mitigating factors:

  • All sums due to clients were ultimately repaid (largely funded by the Respondent's wife) through a Minute of Agreement with the Judicial Factor
  • Respondent eventually cooperated with the Judicial Factor and delivered accounting records

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://www.ssdt.org.uk/findings/law-society-v-anthony-david-murphy/