Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026

The duty in context

No improper solicitation or touting profession

The lawyer must not solicit business through unsolicited approaches, visits or calls to the public, or by touting in a manner likely to bring the profession into disrepute.

239 cases 70% strike-off avg suspension 23.3 mo avg fine 17,641 117 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code CCS 8.9 strong 191 cases
8.9 You do not make unsolicited approaches to members of the public, with the exception of current or former clients, in order to advertise legal services provided by you, or your business or employer.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook rC14 partial
rC14 If you solicit work in any jurisdiction outside England and Wales, you must not do so in a manner which would be prohibited if you were a member of the local Bar.
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 R.12.4 strong
An attorney-at-law's practice shall not be publicised in the Cayman Islands by means of unsolicited visits or telephone calls to members of the public.
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 34.2 partial 29 cases
In the conduct or promotion of a solicitor's practice, the solicitor must not seek instructions for the provision of legal services in a manner likely to oppress or harass a person who, by reason of some recent trauma or injury, or other circumstances, is, or might reasonably be expected to be, at a significant disadvantage in dealing with the solicitor at the time when the instructions are sought.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules no clear equivalent
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch9 — Touting strong 5 cases
A solicitor should not make a direct uninvited approach to any person with a view to being instructed to provide legal services, where this approach is likely to bring the solicitors' profession into disrepute. Approaches should not be made an inappropriate locations.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 6.5(b) partial 5 cases
Barristers speaking or writing as permitted by paragraph 6.3 above shall not: ... (b) Directly or indirectly suggest that any client or class of client were advised to employ them;
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon II(b); Canon II(c); Canon II(d) strong 5 cases
An Attorney shall not in the carrying on of his practice or otherwise permit any act or thing which is likely or is intended to attract business unfairly or can reasonably be regarded as touting or advertising. (c) An Attorney shall not endeavour by direct or indirect means to attract the clients of his fellow Attorneys.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code R.8.4 strong
A member's practice must not be publicised in Jersey by means of unsolicited visits or telephone calls to a member of the public. A member of the public does not include current or former clients, existing or former business or professional connections or other members or other commercial organisations.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 4.1-2 strong
In offering legal services, a lawyer shall not use means that (a) are false or misleading; (b) amount to coercion, duress, or harassment; (c) take advantage of a person who is vulnerable or who has suffered a traumatic experience and has not yet had a chance to recover; (d) are intended to influence a person who has retained another lawyer or paralegal for a particular matter to change that representative for that matter, unless the change is initiated by the person or that representative; or (e) otherwise bring the profession or the administration of justice into disrepute.
BC Lawyers BC Code r 4.2-5, commentary [1] partial 2 cases
For example, a marketing activity violates this rule if it: (a) is calculated or likely to take advantage of the vulnerability, either physical or emotional, of the recipient, ... (c) otherwise brings the administration of justice into disrepute.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 10.10 strong
A lawyer must not directly contact a prospective client— (a) in a way that is intrusive, offensive, or inappropriate; or (b) if the lawyer knows or should know that the physical, emotional, or mental state of the person is such that the person could not exercise reasonable judgement in engaging a lawyer, or the lawyer is aware that the prospective client does not wish to be contacted by the lawyer.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct no clear equivalent
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 39 (Touting and referrals) strong
39 Touting and referrals
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 3.03 strong
A solicitor must not obtain business by improper means. ... Improper means can include ... obtaining business by touting (in contravention to the Solicitors' Practice Promotion Code), undue influence, arrangement to share fees or proceeds of litigation with unqualified persons.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 8.1(b)(vi)-(viii) strong
Advertising or promotion must not:- (vi) be intrusive, offensive or otherwise inappropriate having regard to the manner, medium, frequency of approach or surrounding circumstances; ... (viii) take place in or in the immediate vicinity of a hospital or similar medical establishment, court, tribunal, police station or place of detention;

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

223 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Nicholas Devlin
    SDT solicitor 12862/2025 2026-04-20 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Buckley, Nathan Andrew
    OLSC solicitor G & B Lawyers [2025] NSWCATOD 98 2025-07-29 found breached

    Proceedings no. 2023/00140580 (Social Media Application) 1. Made public statements encouraging residents To breach laws by providing false information to the ASIC for the purpose of avoiding the effect of applicable pub…

    Costs Order recommending removal of lawyer's name from the Supreme Court Roll $0.00 1 PDF View decision
  • Mills Kirin
    LSC-QLD solicitor Seraphus Solicitors 2024-11-14 found breached

    Respondent's conduct the subject of Charge 1 amounts to unsatisfactory professional conduct

    Fined 1 PDF View decision
  • David Durkin-Finch
    SDT solicitor 12586/2024 2024-11-01 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Lack of Integrity, Recklessness, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Prohibition Order, Suspend - Fixed Period 1 PDF View decision
  • Dominic Leon Macknight
    SDT solicitor 12544/2024 2024-07-15 found breached

    Breaches, Code of Conduct for Solicitors, REL's & RFL's 2019, Dishonesty, Failures, Lack of Integrity, Misappropriation of Client Account, Solicitors Accounts Rules 2019, SRA Principles 2019

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • (unnamed)
    SDT solicitor 12475/2023 2023-12-14 found breached
    Determination of Indefinite Suspension - Granted 1 PDF View decision
  • Sean Garvin Moses Osbourne
    GLC attorney 105 of 2022 2023-11-03 found breached

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered November 03, 2023. | Struck off, Restitution ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 26, 2024. | Formal Order View PDF DE…

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct 1 PDF View decision
  • KELVIN KA CHUEN TANG
    LPBWA lawyer Suite 2 191 James Street NORTHBRIDGE WA, 6003 Legal Profession Complaints Committee v Tang [2022] WASC 2022-06-17 found breached

    Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners

    Struck Off the Roll of Practitioners 1 PDF View decision
  • Omolarami Akindiji
    SDT solicitor 12275/2022 2022-03-15 found breached

    Breaches

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Cameron James McKenzie
    LSC-QLD solicitor 2021-12-01 found breached

    The respondent engaged in professional misconduct.

    Struck off 1 PDF View decision
  • KELVIN KA CHUEN TANG
    LPBWA lawyer Suite 2 191 James Street NORTHBRIDGE WA, 6003 Legal Profession Complaints Committee v Tang [2021] WASAT 2021-09-03 found breached

    Professional Misconduct

    Professional Misconduct 1 PDF View decision
  • Caroline Jones & Hillyer McKeown LLP
    SDT solicitor 12262/2021 2021-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Fine 1 PDF View decision
  • Christopher James Rosser
    LSC-QLD barrister 2020-10-20 found breached

    On each of Charges 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11 the respondent engaged in professional misconduct

    Struck off 1 PDF View decision
  • Konrad Malik
    LSBC lawyer 2020-03-30 found breached

    Rule 4-29 Admission of Conduct and Undertaking to Discipline Committee | Summary

    Rule 4-29 Admission of Conduct and Undertaking to Discipline Committee | Summary 1 PDF View decision
  • Howard A. Lettman
    GLC attorney 57 of 2008 2020-01-25 found breached

    Struck off, Restitution ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered January 25, 2020. || Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered November 23, 2019 View PDF FORMAL ORDER OF T…

    Struck off, Restitution ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • Timothy Vincent Charles Meehan
    LSC-QLD solicitor Bosscher Lawyers 2019-02-18 found breached

    Guilty of professional misconduct with respect to Charges 1 and 2

    Struck off 1 PDF View decision
  • Roger Paul Jackson & Second Respondent & Third Respondent
    SDT solicitor 11921/2019 2019-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Failures

    Fine, Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Imelda Leahy
    LSI solicitor Imelda Leahy and Company, Solicitors, Kilree Street, Bagenalstown, Co Carlow 2018-07-20 found breached

    In the matter of Imelda Leahy, a solicitor formerly practising as Imelda Leahy and Company, Solicitors, Kilree Street, Bagenalstown, Co Carlow, and in the matter of an application by the Law Society of Ireland to the So…

    strike_off View decision
  • Kuldip Singh
    SDT solicitor 11837/2018 2018-01-01 found breached

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Philip Joseph Shiner & John Dickinson
    SDT solicitor 11510/2016 2016-01-01 found breached text match

    Breaches

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • CAROL PENN
    LPBWA lawyer PO Box 153 MIRRABOOKA WA 6941 VR 18 of 2015 2015-12-18 found breached

    Professional Misconduct

    Professional Misconduct 1 PDF View decision
  • Silvan Sylvester Senior
    SDT solicitor 11349/2015 2015-01-01 found breached

    Others

    No Order 1 PDF View decision
  • DEAN RICHARD LOVE
    LPBWA lawyer PO Box 3263 PERTH WA 6832 VR 159 of 2013 2014-07-04 found breached

    Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct

    Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct 1 PDF View decision
  • Aiden Barry
    LSI solicitor Aiden Barry Solicitor, Roche House, 8 Bank Place, Limerick, Co Limerick 2014-04-28 found breached

    In the matter of Aiden Barry, solicitor, formerly practising as Aiden Barry Solicitor, Roche House, 8 Bank Place, Limerick, Co Limerick, and in the matter of the Solicitors Acts 1954-2011 [7243/DT60/13 and High Court re…

    strike_off View decision
  • Keith Guy William Armstrong
    SSDT solicitor Keith Guy William Armstrong, formerly of Dundas & Wilson, Solicitors, Saltire Court, 20 Castle Terrace, Edinburgh and now c/o Levy McRae Solicitors, 266 St Vincent Street, Glasgow 2014-04-03 found breached
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.