Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Michael Weston - Graham North

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number7110/1996
Date01/01/1996
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
Suspension12 months
CostsGBP 10,157
Dishonesty foundYes

Three partners of Burton Yeates Westburys faced allegations of breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules and misuse of trust/client monies. Mr North admitted all allegations, including a conviction for furnishing false information (12 months' imprisonment) arising from a fictitious £100,000 bill used to meet partnership liabilities; the Tribunal expressly found dishonesty and struck him off, ordering him to pay 70% of £10,156.50 costs. Mr Weston, an equity partner, was found guilty of accounts breaches through a 'grave abstention of duty' (no dishonesty alleged or found) and was also struck off, paying 15% of costs. Respondent 3, a salaried partner, admitted most allegations (no dishonesty/personal gain found) but had not been frank with the investigator and signed an untrue statement; she was suspended for 12 months with practice conditions recommended, paying 15% of costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Mr North's dishonest use of trust/client money (a £100,000 fictitious bill) to meet partnership liabilities
  • Criminal conviction and custodial sentence for Mr North
  • Substantial claims on Compensation Fund (£112,442.67 paid, £85,870 pending) and costs to profession
  • Respondent 3 not frank with Investigation Accountant and signed a statement she knew was untrue
  • Mr Weston's grave abstention from duty as equity partner, signing transfers/cheques without enquiry

Mitigating factors:

  • Mr Weston: previously unblemished career, no knowledge of the fictitious bill, positive references, already suffered six-month suspension and bankruptcy
  • Respondent 3: junior salaried partner with no access to detailed accounts, acted under pressure/health difficulties, not for personal gain, improper transfers rectified with no loss to clients, effectively suspended since intervention
  • Mr North: cooperated with successor firms, accepted responsibility

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/7110/