§ discipline
‹ Browse decisions

Philip John Williams

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number9569/2006
Date01/01/2006
OutcomeSuspend - Indefinite

Allegation / charges

Failures

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionSuspension
CostsGBP 2,684
Dishonesty foundNo

Philip John Williams, a solicitor admitted in 1981, admitted four allegations of conduct unbefitting a solicitor for failing to deliver Accountant's Reports for the years ended 30 June 2002 to 2005 following the closure of his firm in December 2002. He attributed his failures to severe health problems. The Tribunal expressed concern that over £21,879.81 of client funds (including £17,000 relating to an estate) remained in a non-protected Abbey National account, with beneficial owners possibly unaware. Given a prior 2002 reprimand for similar matters and the need to protect the public, the Tribunal imposed an indefinite suspension and ordered costs of £2,683.75. No finding of dishonesty was made.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Previous disciplinary appearance in 2002 (reprimand) for similar failings
  • Client funds in excess of £21,879.81 held in a non-solicitor (Abbey National) account without client account protection
  • Beneficial owners of funds likely unaware monies were being held
  • No steps taken to deliver outstanding Reports despite ceasing medication two years earlier
  • A further Accountant's Report (not part of the allegations) also overdue
  • No medical evidence provided at this hearing

Mitigating factors:

  • Suffered substantial health problems including four years of depression and agoraphobia
  • Now rehabilitated and employed as a project manager
  • Admitted the allegations
  • Accounts said to have been kept scrupulously with full printout on retirement
  • Expressed intention to have Reports prepared within three months

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/9569/