Whitting, William John
Allegation / charges
1. Acted for an aged father and his son in relation to the transfer of real property owned solely by the father to the son for a consideration of $1.00 without:<BR/>(a) Properly assessing the capacity of the father<BR/>(b) Obtaining any medical evidence as to the father?s capacity and without referring the father to obtain independent financial advice<BR/>(c) Obtaining the services of an independent interpreter but instead relying on the interpretation provided by the son<BR/>2. Acted in a conflict of interest <BR/> — Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
The practitioner acted for both an aged father and his son in transferring the father's real property to the son for $1.00 without properly assessing the father's capacity, obtaining medical evidence, referring the father for independent financial advice, or engaging an independent interpreter (relying instead on the son). This conduct, together with acting in a conflict of interest, was found to constitute unsatisfactory professional conduct. No dishonesty was found and no sanction is recorded in the extract.
Duties found breached:
- No improper communication with the court
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- No own-interest conflict
⚠ figures not found verbatim in the source were dropped: ["extracted_from_register_summary"]
Duties engaged
Other decisions involving this respondent
Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.
Documents
No documents recorded.
Source: https://portal.olsc.nsw.gov.au/dasearchbn/daresultdetail?id=3a5fa7df-b633-eb11-bf74-000d3ad1941e