Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Colin D Poole

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number10129/2008
Date01/01/2008
OutcomeFine, Strike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules, Others

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
FineGBP 5,000
CostsGBP 100,000
Dishonesty foundYes

Colin David Poole, founder of Poole & Co and CEO of Claims Direct, faced disciplinary charges arising from the Claims Direct operation. The Tribunal found he dishonestly misrepresented to clients and franchisees that ATE insurance premiums would be recoverable when he knew this was extremely unlikely (Charges 1-3), improperly accepted and paid referral fees (Charge 4), dishonestly effected a sham sale of Poole & Co to mislead investors at flotation (Charge 5), and dishonestly failed to disclose the £50m personal benefit to directors in the prospectus (Charge 6). He was also found to have failed to account, made an improper transfer, and derived a secret profit on telegraphic transfer fees. Given the findings of dishonesty, he was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay costs (interim payment £100,000; total claim £242,311.77 subject to assessment). The Second Respondent admitted lesser accounts-rules and PII-application allegations (dishonesty withdrawn) and was fined £5,000 with £5,000 costs.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Findings of dishonesty on multiple charges
  • Substantial personal financial gain (~£20 million within three months)
  • Conduct affected large numbers of clients (approx 8,000 who could not recover premiums)
  • Tribunal found the First Respondent not a credible witness

Mitigating factors:

  • Second Respondent: early admissions, relative youth, inexperience and naivety, full co-operation
  • Delay of some 10 years over which respondents had no control (as to Second Respondent)
  • First Respondent: put in place an ex gratia payment scheme; 22 years' practice without complaints as to his work

Duties engaged

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/10129/