Decision record
Syed Tauseef Rizvi
Allegation / charges
Breaches
Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision
Syed Tauseef Rizvi, a solicitor working on a temporary contract at the Treasury Solicitor's Department, missed the deadline to file and serve a Defence in the case of W v MOJ. To conceal this, he falsely told the Court and his opponent that the Defence had been served on 13 November 2013, created and backdated correspondence, induced the client representative to sign a backdated Defence, and produced a signed witness statement with a statement of truth containing untrue statements. He admitted all allegations including dishonesty (dishonesty in allegation 1.4 was withdrawn by amendment). The Tribunal found high culpability and deliberate, planned dishonesty over several months, and concluded there were no exceptional circumstances to avoid striking off. He was struck off the Roll and ordered to pay agreed costs of £4,000.
Duties found breached:
- Proper basis for allegations
- Act in the client's best interests
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
Aggravating factors:
- Dishonesty which was serious
- Misconduct continued over a period from mid-December 2013 to late March 2014
- Actions were planned and deliberate, including drafting a false witness statement with a statement of truth
- Drew others in, inducing Mr Winfield to sign a backdated Defence
- Concealed wrongdoing, failing to inform line manager even in handover notes
- Gave a non-credible explanation to his line manager after leaving TSol
- Breached trust placed in him by a government client (the Crown)
- Misconduct harmed the reputation of the profession and caused public money to be spent correcting it
Mitigating factors:
- Otherwise unblemished career; no previous disciplinary matters
- Misconduct related to conduct of just one matter
- Cooperated with the Applicant and Tribunal, made admissions
- Showed insight and offered apologies
- Suffered significant personal and professional stress (bereavement of his mother, pressured arranged marriage and its breakdown, financial concerns, job insecurity, studying for a Masters, heavy caseload, lack of supervision)
- No financial or personal gain
- Supportive testimonials and GP letter
Duties engaged
- Overriding duty to the court
- Proper basis for allegations
- Honesty
- Integrity
- No bribery or improper gifts
- Personal probity and fitness to practise
- Uphold public trust in the profession
- No unlawful discrimination or harassment
- Act in the client's best interests
- Non-discriminatory acceptance and cab-rank
- Serve justice and improve the law