Skip to main content
discipline 3 October 2026
‹ Browse decisions

Decision record

Rajesh Babajee

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
BodySolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)
Professionsolicitor
Case number11445/2015
Date01/01/2015
OutcomeStrike off

Allegation / charges

Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

Findings — machine-extracted (anthropic-batch:claude-opus-4-8); verify against the decision

SanctionStrike Off
CostsGBP 34,768
Dishonesty foundYes

Rajesh Babajee, a sole practitioner, was found to have misappropriated client monies arising from the sale of a property (122 C Street), using at least £45,000 of the proceeds improperly for his own and third parties' benefit after being aware the executed TR1 Transfer Deed had not been delivered to the purchaser's solicitors. The Tribunal proceeded in his absence following substituted service by newspaper advertisements. Seven of the twelve allegations were proved, including breaches of the Solicitors Accounts Rules, failing to open/maintain a client account, failing to safeguard records, failing to deliver an accountants' report, purporting to practise when not entitled, and failing to deliver a Transfer Deed. Dishonesty was expressly found regarding the misappropriation. Three allegations were found not proved and one partially. With no exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal ordered him struck off and to pay costs of £34,767.84.

Duties found breached:

Aggravating factors:

  • Dishonesty found to highest standard
  • Overall catalogue of proven breaches described as 'a masterclass in failure to comply with the basic requirements of practise as a solicitor'
  • Use of client funds for personal benefit including cash withdrawals and card payments to retailers
  • Failed to engage with the regulator and avoided the proceedings
  • Obstructed former partners of Lambeth Solicitors in filing accountants' report

Mitigating factors:

  • No previous disciplinary matters recorded

Duties engaged

Other decisions involving this respondent

  • Decision 2017-02-16 · BTAS · England & Wales
  • Decision 2015-03-09 · BTAS · England & Wales

Matched by respondent name — may include a different person with the same name.

Documents

Source: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/case/11445/