Skip to main content
discipline 4 October 2026

The duty in context

Honesty integrity

The lawyer must act with honesty at all times in professional and business dealings and must not engage in fraudulent or deceitful conduct.

2,349 cases 67% strike-off avg suspension 18.6 mo avg fine 9,300 344 with dishonesty finding

How the codes express this duty

E&W Solicitors SRA Principles & Code Principle 4 strong 1,658 cases
You act: 1.4 with honesty.
E&W Barristers BSB Handbook CD3; rC9.1; rC8 strong 130 cases
CD3 You must act with honesty, and with integrity. rC9.1 you must not knowingly or recklessly mislead or attempt to mislead anyone. rC8 You must not do anything which could reasonably be seen by the public to undermine your honesty, integrity (CD3) or independence (CD4).
Cayman Islands Legal Services Code 2026 P.3; R.3.1; R.3.2 strong
Attorneys-at-law shall, at all times, act with honesty and integrity... An attorney-at-law's duty to act with honesty and integrity under P.3 includes the requirement that an attorney-at-law shall — (a) not knowingly or recklessly mislead or attempt to mislead anyone
AU Solicitors Solicitors' Conduct Rules Rule 4.1.2 strong 221 cases
A solicitor must also:... 4.1.2 be honest and courteous in all dealings in the course of legal practice.
AU Barristers Uniform Barristers Rules rr12(a),5(c) strong 78 cases
A barrister must not engage in conduct which is: (a) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister. ... barristers as specialist advocates in the administration of justice, must act honestly, fairly, skilfully and with competence and diligence.
IE Solicitors Law Society Guide Ch1 — Core values: Honesty; Ch6 — Professional standard of conduct strong 24 cases
This requires solicitors to be honest and forthright in all professional and business relationships... A solicitor, whether in their professional capacity or otherwise, must not engage in any conduct that is fraudulent, deceitful, or in any way contrary to their position as a solicitor and as an officer of the court.
IE Barristers Bar Code of Conduct Rule 2.3(b) strong 24 cases
It is the duty of Barristers: ... (b) to act at all times with honesty and integrity;
JM Attorneys Canons of Professional Ethics Canon V(o); Canon I(b); Canon IV strong 163 cases
(o) An Attorney shall not knowingly make a false statement of law or fact. ... [I(b)] An Attorney shall at all times maintain the honour and dignity of the profession ... [IV] AN ATTORNEY SHALL ACT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF HIS CLIENT AND REPRESENT HIM HONESTLY, COMPETENTLY AND ZEALOUSLY WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE LAW.
JE Lawyers Law Society of Jersey Code P.3; R.4.2 a) strong
Members must, at all times, act with honesty and integrity... A member's duty to act with honesty and integrity under P.3 includes the following requirements: Members must: a) not knowingly or recklessly mislead or attempt to mislead anyone.
ON Lawyers LSO Rules of Prof. Conduct r 2.1-1 strong
A lawyer has a duty to carry on the practice of law and discharge all responsibilities to clients, tribunals, the public and other members of the profession honourably and with integrity.
BC Lawyers BC Code r 2.2-1 strong 31 cases
A lawyer has a duty to carry on the practice of law and discharge all responsibilities to clients, tribunals, the public and other members of the profession honourably and with integrity.
NZ Lawyers Conduct & Client Care Rules r 10.9 / r 2.4 strong
A lawyer must not engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive anyone on any aspect of the lawyer's practice. ... A lawyer must not advise a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows to be fraudulent or criminal, nor assist any person in an activity that the lawyer knows is fraudulent or criminal.
SCO Solicitors LSS Standards of Conduct B1.2 strong 59 cases
You must be trustworthy and act honestly at all times so that your personal integrity is beyond question.
SG Lawyers Professional Conduct Rules 2015 r 5 (Honesty, competence and diligence) strong 40 cases
5 Honesty, competence and diligence
HK Solicitors Solicitors' Guide Principle 13.01 strong
A solicitor must not act, whether in his professional capacity or otherwise, towards anyone in a way which is fraudulent, deceitful or otherwise contrary to his position as a solicitor, nor must he use his position as a solicitor to take unfair advantage either for himself or another person.
HK Barristers Bar Code of Conduct para 4.1(b)(i) strong
not to engage in conduct (whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise) which is:- (i) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister;

Cases dealing with this duty

Clear

2,349 decisions · link basis: found breached = a tribunal finding; rule cited = the mapped provision is cited in the decision; text match = high-precision text pattern

  • Andrew Eastham
    SDT solicitor 12201/2021 2021-01-01 text match

    Criminal Convictions

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mia Branchette
    SDT solicitor 12229/2021 2021-01-01 text match

    Breaches

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Rajinder Kumar Puri
    SDT solicitor 12248/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Femida Jamali
    SDT solicitor 12205/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Montague Frankel
    SDT solicitor 12244/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Gregory Stuart Saunders
    SDT solicitor 12157/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Simon Sui Ping Hsu
    SDT solicitor 12181/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Gareth Rowan Evans
    SDT solicitor 12227/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Maxine Barnes
    SDT solicitor 12165/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Mohammed Arshad Amin
    SDT solicitor 12173/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Sandra Campbell
    SDT solicitor 12228/2021 2021-01-01 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Julie Margaret Holdaway
    SDT solicitor 12215/2021 2021-01-01 text match

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Geoffrey Rushton
    SDT solicitor 12219/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Client Money, Failures, Solicitors' Accounts Rules

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • John Pursley
    SDT solicitor 12239/2021 2021-01-01 rule cited

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Rupinder Kainth
    SDT solicitor 12170/2021 2021-01-01 found breached rule cited

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Wahid Nazari
    SDT solicitor 12188/2021 2021-01-01 text match

    Criminal Convictions

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Victor Richard Stockinger
    SDT solicitor 12177/2021 2021-01-01 text match

    Breaches, Failures

    Strike off 1 PDF View decision
  • Donovan O. Foote
    GLC attorney 12 of 2015 2020-11-23 text match

    Struck off, Restitution ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered November 23, 2020. || Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered November 23, 2020. View PDF DECISION OF THE…

    Struck off, Restitution ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • John Charles Nason Craxton
    SSDT solicitor John Charles Nason Craxton, residing at 2A Ashton View, Dumbarton 2020-11-09 text match
    strike_off No Appeal 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael Lloyd Wilson
    GLC attorney 128 of 2019 2020-10-31 rule cited

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered October 31, 2020. || Struck off | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 31, 2021. || Formal Order View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCIPLIN…

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct 2 PDFs View decision
  • Christopher James Rosser
    LSC-QLD barrister 2020-10-20 text match

    On each of Charges 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11 the respondent engaged in professional misconduct

    Struck off 1 PDF View decision
  • Michael Rowan
    BTAS barrister Inner Temple 2020-10-14 found breached rule cited
    suspension Final 2 PDFs View decision
  • Rupell, Lewis Raymond
    OLSC solicitor 2020-09-21 text match

    Improperly commenced proceedings on behalf of his principal and client Entered default judgment on behalf of client in circumstances where he knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the client had no entitlement t…

    Reprimand $0.00 About ​ About the OLSC The Commissioner History Mission statement Structure Contact ​ Contact the OLSC Give us your feedback: online surveys Access to information (GIPAA) Community information ​ Information for lawyers Fact sheets FAQs Other regulatory and complaint-handling organisations Contact LawAccess NSW for legal information " You and Your Lawyer", Hot ​​Topics 78 Legal Information Access Centre (LIAC), State Library of NSW​ , provides access to information about the law in NSW regarding your lawyer Privacy Copyright and Disclaimer Website accessibility View decision
  • Arlene Ann Gaynor
    GLC attorney 88 of 2018 2020-08-18 text match

    Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered August 18, 2020. || Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 29, 2020. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCI…

    Struck off, Restitution Ordered 1 PDF View decision
  • Arlene Ann Gaynor
    GLC attorney 88 of 2018 2020-07-29 text match

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered July 29, 2020. || Struck off, Restitution Ordered | Disciplinary Committee decision delivered August 18, 2020. View PDF DECISION OF THE DISCI…

    Guilty of Professional Misconduct 1 PDF View decision

Duty classification does not yet cover every jurisdiction (Ontario, New Zealand and Singapore decisions are indexed but not yet duty-classified), so counts here understate those corpora.